2016
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2015.2493139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Modeling of Axial-Flux Permanent Magnet Eddy Current Couplings With a Slotted Conductor Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the two characteristics is never greater than 2%. This result has been confirmed with other geometrical values and is in accordance with the results given in [6] and [7]. Therefore, it is possible to neglect the back-iron conductivity in order to obtain a simpler model for the axial-field eddy-current magnetic coupling, as it is illustrated in the next section.…”
Section: Impact Of the Conductor Back-iron On The Torque Valuesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the two characteristics is never greater than 2%. This result has been confirmed with other geometrical values and is in accordance with the results given in [6] and [7]. Therefore, it is possible to neglect the back-iron conductivity in order to obtain a simpler model for the axial-field eddy-current magnetic coupling, as it is illustrated in the next section.…”
Section: Impact Of the Conductor Back-iron On The Torque Valuesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The 3-D radial edge effects, which cannot be neglected for such devices, are taken into account by using the well-known Russel and Norsworthy's correction factor [11]. However, it has been shown that this correction factor is not always accurate [5], [6]. Its precision greatly depends on the slip speed and on the coupling geometry: radial depth and pole pitch values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic torque of the AFPMCs with a Halbach array is critical because the operation area of the PMCs is restricted by the maximum allowable torque [8][9][10]. By accurately predicting the maximum torque value, the product can be minimized, and unnecessary production costs can be reduced [11].…”
Section: Results Obtained With 3d Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D integral process of space electromagnetic field is complex, which is unfavorable for rapid optimization design. The validity of the average radius for solving the output torque has been proved in the literature [25][26][27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the output torque is as follows:…”
Section: Torque Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Current studies show that results according to this model are not always accurate. Further, when slip is higher than 10% the error model is unacceptable, such that present studies are limited to less than 10% slip [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In literature [32], according to the slip, the Russell-Norsworthy factor is continuously revised, and the theoretical value is basically consistent with the FEM value within 100% slip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%