2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model of the elastic behavior of a modified face-centered cubic lattice structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, analytical models addressing the mechanical response of specific unit cells have been developed. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] They can provide preliminary insight into the characteristics of a unit cell prior to proceeding with the manufacturing phase in a reasonable amount of time. Those, however, cover only a small fraction of the vast number of existing cells.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adem202000611mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, analytical models addressing the mechanical response of specific unit cells have been developed. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] They can provide preliminary insight into the characteristics of a unit cell prior to proceeding with the manufacturing phase in a reasonable amount of time. Those, however, cover only a small fraction of the vast number of existing cells.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adem202000611mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different situations, orthopedic scaffolds were needed in various mechanical properties. The optimized Diamond/FCC was designed by eliminating the struts corresponding to two parallel faces for better bending performance (Alana et al, 2019). An optimized FCC with longitudinal struts was designed to obtain higher longitudinal compressive properties.…”
Section: The Diamond/fccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the risk of implant loosening, the implants should ideally be developed with comparable mechanical properties to those of natural bones. Metallic porous implants and porous structures have been investigated in the literature to reduce the problems associated with stiffness mismatch of the implants and optimize porous structure designs [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The mechanical properties of porous structures and their biological behavior, such as cell attachment and tissue growth, depend on the structural parameters of the porous structure, including the unit cell type, porosity, and pore size [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-stochastic or periodic cellular structures are built-in regular form and have higher mechanical properties [19]. These are commonly designed based on three-dimensional (3D) unit cells such as diamond lattice [20], Bodycentered-cubic (BCC) [5,8], face-centered-cubic (FCC) [4], Tetrahedron cell, and Octet truss cell [5]. Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), previous studies have analyzed the mechanical behavior of different porous structures under different loading conditions, and the results were consistent when compared with the experimental results [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%