2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2005.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model of cold water front movement in a geothermal reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researches on analytical methods for heat transfer have been conducted by Sauty et al [18], Uffink [19], Voigt and Haefner [20], Krarti and Claridge [21], Yang and Yeh [22], and Stopa and Wojnarowski [23]. Kangas and Lund [17] pointed out that analytical solution is applicable only to the simplest cases or to qualitative estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches on analytical methods for heat transfer have been conducted by Sauty et al [18], Uffink [19], Voigt and Haefner [20], Krarti and Claridge [21], Yang and Yeh [22], and Stopa and Wojnarowski [23]. Kangas and Lund [17] pointed out that analytical solution is applicable only to the simplest cases or to qualitative estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the thermal properties of the buffer and the host rock remain constant in space and time. This assumption is applicable when the change of temperatures in the geological repository is not very large [21]. The decay heat function utilized for the calculations, based on the data of the Taiwan Nuclear Power Factory and the coefficients a 1 , a 2 , and a 3 in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature front lags the fluid front by a constant depended on the ratio of rock/water volumetric heat capacities. An analytical model of thermal front propagation for one dimensional, linear flow with variable thermal properties of water-rock system was proposed by Stopa and Wojnarowski [3]. They concluded that thermal front moves slower than the injected water (as in the classical solution) and thermal front velocity differs from the front velocity obtained under the assumption of constant thermal properties by about 1-14% under a wide range of conditions.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%