2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model for the prediction of the tensile behaviour of corroded steel bars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, in the literature a simple linear decaying model 16,19,21,29 was proposed for yield and ultimate strength degradation of corroded bars. Since such strengths parameters refer to the reduced cross-sectional area of the corroded bar, to avoid misunderstanding it is more appropriate to refer to yield load F y and ultimate load F u of the bar (rather than to yield strength and ultimate strength) 46 as follows, respectively:…”
Section: Corrosion-induced Degradation Of Materials Parameters In Rc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, in the literature a simple linear decaying model 16,19,21,29 was proposed for yield and ultimate strength degradation of corroded bars. Since such strengths parameters refer to the reduced cross-sectional area of the corroded bar, to avoid misunderstanding it is more appropriate to refer to yield load F y and ultimate load F u of the bar (rather than to yield strength and ultimate strength) 46 as follows, respectively:…”
Section: Corrosion-induced Degradation Of Materials Parameters In Rc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in the literature a simple linear decaying model 16,19,21,29 was proposed for yield and ultimate strength degradation of corroded bars. Since such strengths parameters refer to the reduced cross‐sectional area of the corroded bar, to avoid misunderstanding it is more appropriate to refer to yield load Fy and ultimate load Fu of the bar (rather than to yield strength and ultimate strength) 46 as follows, respectively: Fy*Fy=1βFy×Δm;Fu*Fu=1βFu×Δm Several empirical values of βFy were determined in the literature through statistical regression of available experimental results, ranging from 0.0050 up to 0.0198, 7 depending on the average corrosion degree Δm, the nature of exposure (service‐chlorides, service‐carbonation, accelerated corrosion, etc. ), the typology of bar (smooth vs. ribbed) and its position with respect to concrete (embedded or bare) and the kind of corrosion attack.…”
Section: Corrosion‐induced Degradation Of Materials Parameters In Rc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows a schematic representation of a reinforcing bar, suffering pitting corrosion (Zeng et al 3 ) in combination with the stress-strain relation of an undamaged bar (Figure 3b). For determining the effect of corrosion on the strength characteristics and ductility of the reinforcing steel, the loss of mass of a steel bar due to corrosion can be used.…”
Section: Structures With Corroded Reinforcement: Change Of Properties...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e cross section reduction method was adopted for the simulation of the reinforcement corrosion [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Shear Capacity Of Corrodedmentioning
confidence: 99%