2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical methods for determination of anticoagulant rodenticides in biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous Liquid Chromatography on line with two dimensional Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) multi-residue methods have been published to quantify ARs in biological or environmental matrices [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Imran et al [24] published a review of analytical methods for the determination of anticoagulant rodenticides in biological samples; none of them reported the quantification of SGARs diastereoisomers, even less SGARs enantiomers. Consequently no data is today available on SGARs diastereoisomers/enantiomers residues in rodent or non target wildlife after using them as biocide or plant protection purposes, although secondary poisoning evidences and large scale surveys have been documented in the past recent years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous Liquid Chromatography on line with two dimensional Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) multi-residue methods have been published to quantify ARs in biological or environmental matrices [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Imran et al [24] published a review of analytical methods for the determination of anticoagulant rodenticides in biological samples; none of them reported the quantification of SGARs diastereoisomers, even less SGARs enantiomers. Consequently no data is today available on SGARs diastereoisomers/enantiomers residues in rodent or non target wildlife after using them as biocide or plant protection purposes, although secondary poisoning evidences and large scale surveys have been documented in the past recent years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intentional or accidental poisonings with strychnine occur mainly in small animals, especially dogs and occasionally cats, and rarely in farm animals. From animals, for the purposes of toxicological examinations, the most frequently used matrices are stomach contents, blood, and liver, whereas from environmental samples they are baits and feeds [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Cases of strychnine poisoning are usually acute or hyperacute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are numerous AR substances that may enter the environment and so a comprehensive assessment of the presence of AR requires very sensitive and accurate multi-methods, covering a wide range of different ARs. Several analytical approaches for multi-methods for the quantitative determination of AR in biological samples have been developed, such as liquid chromatography (LC) and also ion chromatography (IC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) (Bidny et al 2015 , Chen et al 2009 , Jin et al 2009 , Jin et al 2008 , Marek and Koskinen 2007 ), two-dimensional LC coupled to MS/MS (Marsalek et al 2015 ), IC coupled to fluorescence detection (Jin et al 2007 ), methods using high resolution MS (Schaff and Montgomery 2013 ), and some other strategies that are presented in a review by Imran et al ( 2015 ). Available analytical methods are so far hampered by the number of captured AR, as well as high limits of detection caused by complex biological and environmental matrices that are in contrast to low relevant environmental concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%