15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Identification and Ranking of Choke Points in the National Airspace System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flight frequencies were increased and full liberalization would bring more gains Long et al 29 Utilized two metrics for ranking the choke points and measured the impact of relieving each major choke point…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flight frequencies were increased and full liberalization would bring more gains Long et al 29 Utilized two metrics for ranking the choke points and measured the impact of relieving each major choke point…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As air traffic keeps growing, if there were insufficient improvements of capacities, the choke points would hinder smooth flight operations in the future. Long et al 29 presented their evaluation of NAS choke points for 2012, 2020, 2030 and 2040, under assumptions that the airspace and airport capacities would improve. They utilized two metrics (flight delay and throughput) for ranking the choke points and measured the impact of relieving each major choke point, regarding less flight delay or more NAS-wide throughput.…”
Section: For Conflict Detection and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%