2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2006
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2006.354357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Geometric Model for Photon Coincidence Detection in 3D PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D approximations have been proposed (Selivanov et al 2000, Strul et al 2003, Yamaya et al 2005. In 3D methods, the complexity of exact calculations (de la Prieta et al 2006) has suggested the use of multiple ray-tracing methods to approximate volumes of intersection and physical properties of crystals (Moehrs et al 2008, Yamaya et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D approximations have been proposed (Selivanov et al 2000, Strul et al 2003, Yamaya et al 2005. In 3D methods, the complexity of exact calculations (de la Prieta et al 2006) has suggested the use of multiple ray-tracing methods to approximate volumes of intersection and physical properties of crystals (Moehrs et al 2008, Yamaya et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption, being valid for CT, is not completely realistic for PET and SPECT acquisitions [6][7][8][9]. In SPECT some efforts have been devoted to take into account this spatially variant detector response [9], but the impact of it on TDCC has not been fully addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%