2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-2011-02512-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical formulae for extended $_{3}F_{2}$-series of Watson–Whipple–Dixon with two extra integer parameters

Abstract: By combining the linearization method with Dougall's sum for well-poised 5 F 4-series, we investigate the generalized Watson series with two extra integer parameters. Four analytical formulae are established, which can also be used to evaluate the extended Whipple and Dixon series via the Thomae transformation. Twelve concrete formulae are presented as exemplification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compute the moments m k we expand the hypergeometric sum, integrate term-by-term and find an integral of the form (5.13), but with the replacements M → M + l/2 and k → k − M + l/2 for some l ∈ Z ≥0 . Resumming this again we have (5.19 (24) of [12] we see that what we seek is W 2k,0 (a, b, c) with a = −2M, b = 1 + β, c = −β (of course β = 2M but we only apply the termination through one parameter initially). Thus we can utilise Theorem 5, pg.…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)173mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to compute the moments m k we expand the hypergeometric sum, integrate term-by-term and find an integral of the form (5.13), but with the replacements M → M + l/2 and k → k − M + l/2 for some l ∈ Z ≥0 . Resumming this again we have (5.19 (24) of [12] we see that what we seek is W 2k,0 (a, b, c) with a = −2M, b = 1 + β, c = −β (of course β = 2M but we only apply the termination through one parameter initially). Thus we can utilise Theorem 5, pg.…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)173mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that the 4 F 3 (1) on the right-hand side of (4.2) is almost related to h(a) by the operation a → a + 1 -see (8.3). This result is particularly interesting because the 3 F 2 (1) that appears in (4.2) is a limiting case contiguous to Watson's theorem [16] and therefore can be evaluated in closed form:…”
Section: The Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that d = −c − n, the 3 F 2 (1) on the right-hand side of (7.4) is easily identified (Note: here only, n ≥ −2 ) as being contiguous to Watson's theorem ([17, entry 1]) for which general closed forms are well known [16]. However, because the top and bottom parameters are almost all separated by integers, this becomes a very complicated general limiting case; when the limits are all evaluated, the result contains far too many terms to realistically reproduce here.…”
Section: Special Case D=-c-nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the method due to Chu [3], we shall establish the following two families of summation formulae for q-Watson type 4φ3-series:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%