2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2007.10.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical expressions of the electrical conductivity and the temperature coefficient of resistivity of two thin coaxial metallic wires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and 5. It appears clearly that these figures are in good agreement with the asymptotic equation (15) in the whole range of the experimental thickness, except at the lowest thickness (two experimental data, only). Furthermore, it must be noted that the author's experiments have shown that the electrical resistivity dropped from 32.34 ± 0.50 to 3.09 ± 0.03 cm, when the thickness increased from 11.5 to 15.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 and 5. It appears clearly that these figures are in good agreement with the asymptotic equation (15) in the whole range of the experimental thickness, except at the lowest thickness (two experimental data, only). Furthermore, it must be noted that the author's experiments have shown that the electrical resistivity dropped from 32.34 ± 0.50 to 3.09 ± 0.03 cm, when the thickness increased from 11.5 to 15.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(15) and the sophisticated model of Namba and the computed fittings given by the authors are not necessary for interpreting the experiments. The effects of the three types of scatterings are simultaneously taken into account and the value of the deduced specular reflection coefficient is very near from that given by the authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation