2020
DOI: 10.1177/0956059920902375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical equations for the connectivity matrices and node positions of minimal and extended tensegrity plates

Abstract: Tensegrity structures are three-dimensional networks of truss members loaded in tension or compression. The location of the end points of the truss members, denoted as the nodes, and the associated node-member connectivity matrices are the fundamental descriptors in the modeling and design of tensegrity structures. This paper presents systematic analytical formulas for such node locations and connectivity matrices for tensegrity plates of two different topologies. The formulas apply to plates of any thickness,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tensegrity structures are most suitable to serve as morphing structures to achieve different shapes like tensegrity plates, domes, self-tunable antennas and wings [ [18], [19], [20]]. However, much of the research in the past was done using static or kinematic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensegrity structures are most suitable to serve as morphing structures to achieve different shapes like tensegrity plates, domes, self-tunable antennas and wings [ [18], [19], [20]]. However, much of the research in the past was done using static or kinematic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensegrity provides a unique method in which shape change can be achieved without a change in stiffness of the structure, and stiffness can also be changed without changing the shape of the structure. This is achievable as structure morphs from one equilibrium configuration to another on the control surface [6,17] as shown in figure 1.1. This morphing from one equilibrium position to another equilibrium position also results in minimal control energy requirement for shape change [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%