2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2008.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical computation of amplification of coupling in relativistic equations with Yukawa potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is the generalization of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule [9] and the WKB [10][11][12]. Except for these approaches, the quasilinearization method (QLM) has played an important role in dealing with arbitrary physical potentials numerically [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Recently, Yin et al have shown why the SWKB is exact for all shape invariant potentials [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is the generalization of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule [9] and the WKB [10][11][12]. Except for these approaches, the quasilinearization method (QLM) has played an important role in dealing with arbitrary physical potentials numerically [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Recently, Yin et al have shown why the SWKB is exact for all shape invariant potentials [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the exact quantization rule is a generalization of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule [15] and the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) [16]. Except for these approaches mentioned above, the quasilinearization method (QLM) as another efficient and powerful approach has shown a central role in quantum mechanics [17][18][19][20][21] since QLM itself is extremely general and was applied to solve arbitrary physical potentials numerically. Recently, Yin, Cao and Shen have shown the supersymmetric Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (SWKB) is exact for all shape invariant potentials [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same numerical values of η exact is used with Ref. [22] to compare our numerical results. We plot the 1/r and the approximation 2αe −αr (1 − e −αr ) versus r. It seems that the energy eigenvalues have a good accuracy up to the values of η ≤ 0.25 and α ≤ 0.30.…”
Section: Bound State Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We restrict ourselves for only s-states and take m 0 = 1 because of the computation in Ref. [22]. Our parameters η and α correspond to λ and k(≡ ωλ), respectively.…”
Section: Bound State Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%