2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical applications of partitioning in aqueous two-phase systems: Exploring protein structural changes and protein–partner interactions in vitro and in vivo by solvent interaction analysis method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considered together, these observations and considerations support an important notion: the analysis of the protein expression levels in biological fluids may not be the optimal focus of clinical proteomic research and that novel proteomic approaches are needed for the discovery of structure- and function-based next generation or smart biomarkers [151,152]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considered together, these observations and considerations support an important notion: the analysis of the protein expression levels in biological fluids may not be the optimal focus of clinical proteomic research and that novel proteomic approaches are needed for the discovery of structure- and function-based next generation or smart biomarkers [151,152]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The components of each phase are immiscible despite containing about 80% water (molal base). Each phase has different characteristics, which allows them to partition a sample with different molecules (Zaslavsky et al, 2016). They are considered as a primary recovery stage for the separation of biological molecules, due to the large amount of water they contain.…”
Section: Laccase As By-product From Food Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the effect of the polymer MW in the protein partition is commonly associated with at least one of the two following phenomena: (i) steric exclusion of the protein; 45,46 (ii) increase of the relative hydrophobicity of the polymer rich-phase (reduction of hydrophilic groups/hydrophobic area ratio). 19,27,47,48 The excluded volume effect implies that interactions between polymer and protein are limited to the absence of steric overlap, where small polymer molecules can occupy the entire volume fraction not filled with protein, 49 while the increase of relative hydrophobicity of the polymer-rich phase favors the partition of hydrophobic proteins into it (due to the hydrophobic interaction between the non-polar amino acid residues of the proteins and the ethylene groups of the PEG). 50 However, note that the most hydrophobic PEG can be excluded from hydrophilic domains of the proteins, decreasing its solubility in the PEG-rich phase.…”
Section: Control Of Asnase Partition By Selecting the Nature Of Polymmentioning
confidence: 99%