Proceeding of International Heat Transfer Conference 4 1970
DOI: 10.1615/ihtc4.2680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and Experimental Heat Transfer Studies in a Spiral Plate Heat Exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tangri and Jayaraman (1962) made similar measurements with water in a double spiral with unequally sized channels for Re > 3000 and obtained values exceeding the predicted values for a straight channel by approximately 60%. Buonopane and Troupe (1970) correlated their own data for Nu for water in both sides of a double-spiral heat exchanger at Re from 4000 to 91000 with an expression which differs negligibly from a widely accepted one for straight channels. More recently, Morimoto and Hotta (1986) measured heattransfer coefficients for Re from 2.5 X 103 to 104 in several double-spiral heat exchangers with different radii of curvature and different angular locations of the inlet and outlet at the periphery.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tangri and Jayaraman (1962) made similar measurements with water in a double spiral with unequally sized channels for Re > 3000 and obtained values exceeding the predicted values for a straight channel by approximately 60%. Buonopane and Troupe (1970) correlated their own data for Nu for water in both sides of a double-spiral heat exchanger at Re from 4000 to 91000 with an expression which differs negligibly from a widely accepted one for straight channels. More recently, Morimoto and Hotta (1986) measured heattransfer coefficients for Re from 2.5 X 103 to 104 in several double-spiral heat exchangers with different radii of curvature and different angular locations of the inlet and outlet at the periphery.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The numerical solutions of Strenger et al (1990) predict a maximum in E (and therefore in e) with increasing N and a possible but undetermined finite value of E (and therefore of e) for asymptotically large N. These two important characteristics were not identified in any of the prior experimental and theoretical work, although a plot of the computed values of Buonopane and Troupe (1970) suggests a possible maximum in e beyond the range of their calculations and one of the corresponding curves of Jones et al (1978) appears to go through a maximum. Bes (1987) inferred from numerical solutions for exchangers with both inlets and outlets at the same angular location that e (and therefore E) approaches a maximum value asymptotically as N increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The exchanger surface is calculated with the mean Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference method (LMTD). According to this method, the exchanged heat can be expressed as follows: (60) The logarithmic mean temperature difference can be calculated by: (61) In the case of a counter-flow exchanger, the temperature differences ΔT a and ΔT b are defined:…”
Section: Lmtd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%