2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and experimental determination of the material intrinsic length scale of strain gradient plasticity theory from micro- and nano-indentation experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
121
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(265 reference statements)
6
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several possible reasons for this including: (i) the current twodimensional discrete dislocation plasticity simulations do not give rise to the square root Taylor relation on which Eq. (9) is based, although this can be included by using the extended set of constitutive rules suggested by Benzerga et al (2004); (ii) the indentation depths in the calculations presented here are restricted to dp0:4 mm and, as discussed by Abu Al-Rub and Voyiadjis (2004), the Nix and Gao (1998) model is most appropriate for indentation depths d41 mm; (iii) the models of Nix and Gao (1998) and of Huang et al (2006) essentially assume no interaction between the statistically stored and geometrically necessary dislocations and this interaction occurs naturally in the discrete dislocation plasticity calculations; (iv) the Nix and Gao (1998) and Huang et al (2006) models assume a hemispherical plastic zone with a radius equal to the nominal contact radius and the single crystal discrete dislocation calculations (see Fig. 7a) give a much larger plastic zone size; and…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible reasons for this including: (i) the current twodimensional discrete dislocation plasticity simulations do not give rise to the square root Taylor relation on which Eq. (9) is based, although this can be included by using the extended set of constitutive rules suggested by Benzerga et al (2004); (ii) the indentation depths in the calculations presented here are restricted to dp0:4 mm and, as discussed by Abu Al-Rub and Voyiadjis (2004), the Nix and Gao (1998) model is most appropriate for indentation depths d41 mm; (iii) the models of Nix and Gao (1998) and of Huang et al (2006) essentially assume no interaction between the statistically stored and geometrically necessary dislocations and this interaction occurs naturally in the discrete dislocation plasticity calculations; (iv) the Nix and Gao (1998) and Huang et al (2006) models assume a hemispherical plastic zone with a radius equal to the nominal contact radius and the single crystal discrete dislocation calculations (see Fig. 7a) give a much larger plastic zone size; and…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When indentation depth is d 1 = 10/30 the friction that occurs in most of the contact region is governed by plastic friction rather than Coulomb friction. In short, both plastic and Coulomb sliding does not take place in the initial indentation A number of experiments on indentation tests [25][26][27][28][29] show that when the metallic material characteristic length scale is on the order of the micrometer or submicron scale, plastic deformation is size-dependent. Classic plasticity theories could not explain size effects and strain gradient theories (see References in Ref.…”
Section: Plastic Sliding During Indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the local and nonlocal metallurgical states also determine the phase transformation progress, the metallurgical variable (local term) and the first and second gradient of (nonlocal terms: ∇ , Δ ) are introduced. In line with [42], a linear coupling of the local and nonlocal terms associated with the metallurgical variable is introduced here (see (12)). During transformations of this kind, a hardening process occurs [7], which is simulated here by the term 1 where 1 denotes the linear isotropic hardening coefficient (which is a dimension of a stress) [8,10].…”
Section: Comments (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%