2015 33rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccd.2015.7357136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic processor model for fast design-space exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application properties to be extrapolated are an input for these analytic hardware models. The work [6,14,22] assumes that these input properties are available and, in contrast to our work, it does not propose a methodology to retrieve those properties for exascale datasets. In the radio-astronomy case study addressed in this work, we demonstrate how an analytic hardware performance model such as the one proposed by Jongerius et al [22] can be coupled to the extrapolation models we are proposing to predict the performance of the exascale system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The application properties to be extrapolated are an input for these analytic hardware models. The work [6,14,22] assumes that these input properties are available and, in contrast to our work, it does not propose a methodology to retrieve those properties for exascale datasets. In the radio-astronomy case study addressed in this work, we demonstrate how an analytic hardware performance model such as the one proposed by Jongerius et al [22] can be coupled to the extrapolation models we are proposing to predict the performance of the exascale system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The performance estimation error of the analytic hardware platform model we use is about 25 % [22]. Given the time saved by the proposed methodology, we consider this accuracy acceptable compared with the Sniper error rate of 21 % [10,22].…”
Section: Comparison To Simulation-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations