2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4950956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic ab initio-based molecular interaction potential for the BrO⋅H2O complex

Abstract: Radical halogen oxide species play important roles within atmospheric processes, specifically those responsible for the removal of O3. To facilitate future investigations on this family of compounds, RCCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ-level electronic structure calculations were employed to generate individual-molecule optimized geometries, as well as to determine the global minimum energy structure for the BrO⋅H2O complex. This information facilitated the generation of several one-dimensional potential energy surface (PES)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(a) shows the radial distribution functions (RDFs) for (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) and (BrO)O· · ·H(water). Interestingly, the results show that the RDF for (BrO)Br· · · O(water) exhibits a peak at the distance of r = 2.4 Å and a valley is at r = 2.8 Å, which is close to the (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) bond distance (2.8 Å) in the global-minimum configuration of the BrO·H 2 O complex at 0 K. 10,15,16 This result indicates that the interaction of (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) at the surface of a water slab is much weaker than that in the gas phase, due to the competitive interactions between (water)H· · ·O(water) and (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) in the water slab. On the other hand, the peak of the RDF for (BrO)O· · ·H(water) appears at r = 2.0 Å, consistent with the (BrO)O· · ·H(water) distance (2.0 Å) in the global-minimum configuration of the BrO·H 2 O complex at 0 K. 10,15,16 This result can be explained by the fact that water molecules tend to expose their H site at the air/water interface, which would favor the hydrogen bonding formation of (BrO)O· · ·H(water).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2(a) shows the radial distribution functions (RDFs) for (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) and (BrO)O· · ·H(water). Interestingly, the results show that the RDF for (BrO)Br· · · O(water) exhibits a peak at the distance of r = 2.4 Å and a valley is at r = 2.8 Å, which is close to the (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) bond distance (2.8 Å) in the global-minimum configuration of the BrO·H 2 O complex at 0 K. 10,15,16 This result indicates that the interaction of (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) at the surface of a water slab is much weaker than that in the gas phase, due to the competitive interactions between (water)H· · ·O(water) and (BrO)Br· · ·O(water) in the water slab. On the other hand, the peak of the RDF for (BrO)O· · ·H(water) appears at r = 2.0 Å, consistent with the (BrO)O· · ·H(water) distance (2.0 Å) in the global-minimum configuration of the BrO·H 2 O complex at 0 K. 10,15,16 This result can be explained by the fact that water molecules tend to expose their H site at the air/water interface, which would favor the hydrogen bonding formation of (BrO)O· · ·H(water).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In particular, bromine containing radical species have been suggested to be more active than the chlorine analogues in the destructive processes. 10 One set of reactions involving bromine [4][5][6] that are crucial to ozone depletion within the marine boundary layer are as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations