2014
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2248737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Expressions for Stochastic Distances Between Relaxed Complex Wishart Distributions

Abstract: The scaled complex Wishart distribution is a widely used model for multilook full polarimetric SAR data whose adequacy has been attested in the literature. Classification, segmentation, and image analysis techniques which depend on this model have been devised, and many of them employ some type of dissimilarity measure. In this paper we derive analytic expressions for four stochastic distances between relaxed scaled complex Wishart distributions in their most general form and in important particular cases. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 1 is a test for the null hypothesis θ 1 = θ 2 based on Lemma 1. Frery et al [27] presented closed expressions for d KL when the random matrices X and Y follow the Wishart distribution:…”
Section: B the Kullback-leibler Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1 is a test for the null hypothesis θ 1 = θ 2 based on Lemma 1. Frery et al [27] presented closed expressions for d KL when the random matrices X and Y follow the Wishart distribution:…”
Section: B the Kullback-leibler Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, for better confirming and validating our choice of Riemannian distance, we will provide in Section 4.3.4 a detailed comparison (i.e., in terms of retrieval performance and computation time) of this metric not only with the mentioned Mahalanobis and Kullback-Leibler metrics but also against some other distance measures of covariance matrices such as the log-Euclidean, the Wishart-like and the Bartlett distances [42,43].…”
Section: Dissimilarity Measure For Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison is made through a goodness-of-fit test, and the p-value of the test statistic is used to define the convolution matrix which will define the filter: the higher the p-value the larger the confidence and, thus, the importance, each observation will have in the convolution. In Torres et al's proposal, the tests are derived from h-/ divergences between multi-look scaled complex Wishart distributions for fully PolSAR data [21]. Their results are competitive with classical and advanced polarimetric filters, with respect to usual quantitative measures of quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%