2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic derivation of the statistical error in the Feynman-αmethod

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, since the two moments are sampled from the same distribution they are correlated, and thus the formalism introduced in Cramer (1962) depends on the covariance of the two moments. The approach taken in Dubi and Kolin (2016) is a bit different, and geometric by nature. Consider YðTÞ ¼ YðM 1 ðTÞ; M 2 ðTÞÞ as a general differential function of the first two moments.…”
Section: Analytic Formulas For the Statistical Uncertainty In The Feymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, since the two moments are sampled from the same distribution they are correlated, and thus the formalism introduced in Cramer (1962) depends on the covariance of the two moments. The approach taken in Dubi and Kolin (2016) is a bit different, and geometric by nature. Consider YðTÞ ¼ YðM 1 ðTÞ; M 2 ðTÞÞ as a general differential function of the first two moments.…”
Section: Analytic Formulas For the Statistical Uncertainty In The Feymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main theme of the present study is the experimental validation of the analytic formulas introduced in Dubi and Kolin (2016). A full description of the construction and the implementation of the formulas is given in Dubi and Kolin (2016), but for sake of completeness, a short description is added.…”
Section: Analytic Formulas For the Statistical Uncertainty In The Feymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations