2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4995952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic definition of spin structure

Abstract: We work on a parallelizable time-orientable Lorentzian 4-manifold and prove that in this case the notion of spin structure can be equivalently defined in a purely analytic fashion. Our analytic definition relies on the use of the concept of a non-degenerate two-by-two formally self-adjoint first order linear differential operator and gauge transformations of such operators. We also give an analytic definition of spin structure for the 3-dimensional Riemannian case.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11]. See also [38,21,9,32] for a wider picture on the role of gauge transformations in the analysis of systems of PDEs.…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11]. See also [38,21,9,32] for a wider picture on the role of gauge transformations in the analysis of systems of PDEs.…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, fully relativistic equations of mathematical physics are not always associated with a natural inner product, not even an indefinite non-degenerate one. As a result, in the Lorentzian setting one is often forced to work with equations, as opposed to operators, see [68,69].…”
Section: Construction Of Hadamard Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows by the argument of Section 6.2 and Section 6.3 once the map GL(2, C) → CSO + (3, 1) is replaced by the map U (2) → SO(3). Our analytic definition of spin structure in dimension three, Definition 8.2, is also equivalent to the standard topological one, which follows from [1] with the help of Diagram 6.10.…”
Section: The 3-dimensional Riemannian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…for some uniquely defined smooth matrix-function O : M → CSO +(3,1).Suppose now that there exists a matrix-function R : M → GL(2, C) such that S prin = R * S prin R. A straightforward calculation shows that the matrix-function O appearing in (6.2) is expressed via R asO j k = 1 det R| −4/3 tr(s j R * s k R). (6.3)It is convenient to define R := | det R| 2/3 R.(6.4) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%