2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2018)070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic continuation of dimensions in supersymmetric localization

Abstract: Abstract:We compute the perturbative partition functions for gauge theories with eight supersymmetries on spheres of dimension d ≤ 5, proving a conjecture by the second author. We apply similar methods to gauge theories with four supersymmetries on spheres with d ≤ 3. The results are valid for non-integer d as well. We further propose an analytic continuation from d = 3 to d = 4 that gives the perturbative partition function for an N = 1 gauge theory. The results are consistent with the free multiplets and the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may potentially worry about the violation of so(7) symmetry for the auxilary fields K m by the localizing term due to the opposite signs in front of K 2,3,4 and K 1,5,6,7 in (7.26). 46 In our case, since δ 2 ε does not induce any so (7) rotation, this does not spoil the δ ε invariance of the localizing term.…”
Section: Comments On Reality Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may potentially worry about the violation of so(7) symmetry for the auxilary fields K m by the localizing term due to the opposite signs in front of K 2,3,4 and K 1,5,6,7 in (7.26). 46 In our case, since δ 2 ε does not induce any so (7) rotation, this does not spoil the δ ε invariance of the localizing term.…”
Section: Comments On Reality Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These equations determine ν m in terms of ε up to an so (7) transformation under which the ν m and the K m transform as a seven-dimensional vector.…”
Section: D Msym With Off-shell Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The main difference between 3d and 4d for this strategy is that in 3d the partition function is a function of three masses, while in 4d it's a function of just one mass, but also of λ that couples to the marginal operator in the stress tensor multiplet, which does not appear in 3d. See however [47] for a proposal for the S 4 partition function of the N = 1 * theory, which is a function of three masses and λ. stress tensor multiplet and S 2 S 2 P P can be related to S 2 S 2 S 2 S 2 using Ward identities that we derive following [31]. 6 Putting these ingredients together allows us to use localization to determine B 4 4 , B 5 4 , and a linear combination of B 6 6,1 and B 6 4 , namely 7B 6 4 + 16B 6 6,1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could also consider taking various mass and gauge coupling derivatives of the N = 1 * partition function on S 4 , for which an expression was proposed in[47] 26. In 3d, first steps of this kind were taken for the maximally supersymmetric ABJM theory, where bootstrap bounds[65,88] have been successfully matched to both localization[89] and large N Mellin space calculations[29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following his seminal work, supersymmetric theories on spheres of dimension d ≤ 7 with different number of supercharges have been studied in [4][5][6][7][8][9]. A uniform approach for perturbative supersymmetric gauge theories on S d was given in [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%