1994
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(94)90103-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic calculation of the ordinary (O) and extraordinary (X) mode nose frequencies on oblique ionograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate sensitivity to the length and direction of propagation, calculations were performed for different path configurations with a central receiver at Xi'an. The (1) The separation on east-west path is susceptible on ionospheric variability, which is inconsistent with previous analysis that the separation does not depend strongly on the ionospheric plasma distribution (Bennett et al 1994), while the separation on north-south path does not show significant correlation with local time and season variations.…”
Section: Dependences On Length and Direction Of Propagationcontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to investigate sensitivity to the length and direction of propagation, calculations were performed for different path configurations with a central receiver at Xi'an. The (1) The separation on east-west path is susceptible on ionospheric variability, which is inconsistent with previous analysis that the separation does not depend strongly on the ionospheric plasma distribution (Bennett et al 1994), while the separation on north-south path does not show significant correlation with local time and season variations.…”
Section: Dependences On Length and Direction Of Propagationcontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Davies (1990) presented the relationship between the JFs of the O-and X-wave (referred as 𝑓 𝑂 and 𝑓 𝑋 separately) reflected for the cases of trans-equatorial and magnetic east-west propagation, which were 𝑓 𝑋 − 𝑓 𝑂 ≈ 𝑓 𝐻 2 /2𝑓 𝑂 and 𝑓 𝑋 − 𝑓 𝑂 ≈ 𝑓 𝐻 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝐼 (𝐼 is the magnetic dip, 𝑓 𝐻 is the electron gyrofrequency) respectively. An explicit formula about the separation in JFs between O-and X-wave (abbreviated as 𝑓 𝑋 − 𝑓 𝑂 ) as a function of local magnetic dip and azimuth of propagation was obtained by Bennett and Dyson (1994) for long paths, and they also showed how to use analytic ray tracing to determine the separation for shorter paths. Lundborg et al (1995) found that the separation varied with propagation distance and maximum observed frequency (MOF), changing between 0.7MHz when MOF was low (about 5MHz) and 0.4MHz when MOF was high (about 15MHz) for propagation over the path Kiruna to Uppsala.…”
Section: Main Text 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Bennett et al [1994] has pointed out, the X‐ray can be seen to a first approximation to have the same properties as the O‐ray displaced in frequency by the O‐X separation. The Doppler shift on the X mode is then approximately that of the corresponding component of the O mode, as was shown from the Doppler ionograms presented by Lynn [2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ray tracing to determine the propagation paths for each interference source is calculated using the PHaRLAP ray tracing software [ Cervera and Harris , ]. Two‐dimensional numerical ray tracing (2‐D NRT) is used, including an empirical correction for magneto‐ionic splitting [ Bennett et al , ]. For applications requiring greater precision, the full three‐dimensional ray tracing can be used, which is more computationally intensive but allows for the effects of ionospheric tilts and more accurate calculation of magneto‐ionic splitting.…”
Section: Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%