2020
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.9.3.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic and numerical bootstrap of CFTs with $O(m)\times O(n)$ global symmetry in 3D

Abstract: Motivated by applications to critical phenomena and open theoretical questions, we study conformal field theories with O(m)\times O(n)O(m)×O(n) global symmetry in d=3d=3 spacetime dimensions. We use both analytic and numerical bootstrap techniques. Using the analytic bootstrap, we calculate anomalous dimensions and OPE coefficients as power series in \varepsilon=4-dε=4−d and in 1/n1/n, with a method that generalizes to arbitrary global symmetry. Whenever comparison is possible, our results agree with earlier r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
66
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(272 reference statements)
10
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The piecewise definition of the Ω transforms in the regions u < v and u > v may appear awkward at first, but it is in fact dictated by analyticity -the expressions in the two different domains are the analytic continuations of each other. 12 We show this in detail in appendix A.1, and give the gist of the argument here. Take for example (2.21) for u < v and analytically continue it in z,z outside of the region u < v. The singularities of the kernel K B (u, v; u , v ) move in the space of w,w and we are forced to deform the contour C − × C + to avoid the singularities.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)243mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The piecewise definition of the Ω transforms in the regions u < v and u > v may appear awkward at first, but it is in fact dictated by analyticity -the expressions in the two different domains are the analytic continuations of each other. 12 We show this in detail in appendix A.1, and give the gist of the argument here. Take for example (2.21) for u < v and analytically continue it in z,z outside of the region u < v. The singularities of the kernel K B (u, v; u , v ) move in the space of w,w and we are forced to deform the contour C − × C + to avoid the singularities.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)243mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.25) 12 The theta function term in (2.20), (2.21) only applies literally when u, v are real and non-negative.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)243mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interesting CFTs usually sit at"kinks" of the bootstrap curve, such as the Ising model [14], the three dimensional O(N ) vector models [15] and many Wilson-Fisher CFTs with flavor symmetry groups to be subgroups of O(N ) [16][17][18][19][20]. Sometimes bootstrap curves shows more than one kink [19-23] 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]), where now the operator X acts as the Hubbard-Stratonovich auxiliary field. Specifically, we use the analytic conformal bootstrap method of large spin perturbation theory, developed in [27][28][29][30], to compute m −1 corrections to scaling dimensions and OPE coefficients. This expansion is valid for all spacetime dimensions d ∈ (2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%