2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyst revenue forecast reporting and the quality of revenues and expenses

Abstract: We decompose earnings quality into revenue and expense quality and examine their associations with analyst propensity to supplement their earnings forecasts with revenue forecasts. Analysts report more revenue forecasts to I/B/E/S when expense quality is low to compensate for the low accuracy of their earnings estimates, which has a positive association with expense quality. Expense quality is unassociated with revenue forecast accuracy, thus revenue forecasts become increasingly useful for valuing firms when … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms manage earnings in the pre-IPO period in such a way that does not affect their future performance (Marquardt and Wiedman, 2004). Analysts are more likely to produce revenue forecasts for younger firms (Bilinski and Eames, 2019). Young firms have a greater magnitude of one-time expenses.…”
Section: Firm Age and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms manage earnings in the pre-IPO period in such a way that does not affect their future performance (Marquardt and Wiedman, 2004). Analysts are more likely to produce revenue forecasts for younger firms (Bilinski and Eames, 2019). Young firms have a greater magnitude of one-time expenses.…”
Section: Firm Age and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 By correlating variability in dividend payments to analysts' supply of dividend forecasts, we can infer how dividend uncertainty is associated with investor demand for dividend information. See DeFond and Hung (2003), Givoly et al (2009), Call et al (2013), Bilinski (2014) and Bilinski and Eames (2019) for similar analysis for cash flow and revenue forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dearth of historical data pertaining to stock performance, firm' operations and financials and complex business models enhance the information asymmetry and ambiguity in valuing the firms (Barg et al, 2021;Gerard Sanders and Boivie, 2004;Menon and James, 2022). Studies found the traditional valuation approaches, namely, the comparable firm approach and the discounted cash flow method, inefficacious in capturing the precise estimates of new firms (Berkman et al, 2000;Bilinski and Eames, 2019;Schosser and Str€ obele, 2019;Schreder and Bilinski, 2021). Kim and Ritter (1999) observed the price-earnings, marketto-book and price-to-sales multiples without adjustment to be modestly effective in valuing young ventures (Kim and Ritter, 1999).…”
Section: Ipo Performance and Valuation Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%