2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2694937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyst Optimism and Stock Price Momentum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Loh and Stulz (2011) demonstrate that a recommendation is more likely to generate a sizable stock reaction if it comes from a leader analyst. Li et al (2015) find that analyst recommendations play an important role in generating the momentum effect. Li et al (2015) find that analyst recommendations play an important role in generating the momentum effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Loh and Stulz (2011) demonstrate that a recommendation is more likely to generate a sizable stock reaction if it comes from a leader analyst. Li et al (2015) find that analyst recommendations play an important role in generating the momentum effect. Li et al (2015) find that analyst recommendations play an important role in generating the momentum effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Jegadeesh and Kim (2010) argue that recommendations that move away from consensus have stronger effects on stock prices. Li et al (2015) find that analyst recommendations play an important role in generating the momentum effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extensive previous literature comprehensively analyses the effects of analyst recommendations on stock prices, and concludes that the investment information they contain is valuable for investors (e.g., Michaely and Womack, 2006;Loh and Mian, 2006;Kecskes et al, 2010;Li et al, 2015). Importantly, recommendation revisions are reported to be more informative than the recommendation levels (e.g., Francis and Soffer, 1997;Jegadeesh et al, 2004;Jegadeesh and Kim, 2010) and to result in significant abnormal stock returns in the direction of the revision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%