2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1437/1/012100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysising the influence factors of single task pricing based on public packet system: An Empirical Study in China

Abstract: This study takes single task pricing as an example, analyzes the key factors of task pricing and constructs an index model of single task pricing through the data of 835 task cases. Through the empirical analysis of the new pricing model, we draw the conclusion: the new pricing model reduces the cost of the task and increases the completion rate. It has a certain guiding significance for the development and management of the public crowdsourcing platforms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk perception level was positively correlated with the education, attribute of living place, average annual household income, sub-health duration , number of employees in the unit and sub-health proportion in the unit (P < 0.05), and negatively correlated with age (P < 0.05). Generally, there will be a multicollinearity problem when the correlation coe cient is more than 0.9, and there may be a problem when the correlation coe cient is over 0.8 [31][32] , so 0.6 is the baseline for an acceptable correlation coe cient [33]. In this study, only the correlation coe cient between age and working years or age and the number of children exceeds 0.6, and both correlation coe cients were 0.66.…”
Section: Results Of Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The risk perception level was positively correlated with the education, attribute of living place, average annual household income, sub-health duration , number of employees in the unit and sub-health proportion in the unit (P < 0.05), and negatively correlated with age (P < 0.05). Generally, there will be a multicollinearity problem when the correlation coe cient is more than 0.9, and there may be a problem when the correlation coe cient is over 0.8 [31][32] , so 0.6 is the baseline for an acceptable correlation coe cient [33]. In this study, only the correlation coe cient between age and working years or age and the number of children exceeds 0.6, and both correlation coe cients were 0.66.…”
Section: Results Of Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These significant correlations are highlighted in Table 2 . Generally, there could be a multicollinearity problem when the correlation coefficient (r) is above 0.9, 33 , 34 so correlation coefficient of less than 0.6 would be an acceptable baseline for validated analysis. Therefore, Pearson analysis results support study hypothesis 3 (H 3 ) showing treatment satisfaction for medication positively affects the Quality of Life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depression was assessed from questions 3, 5, 10, 13, 16, 17, and 21. The total score depression subscale score was subdivided into normal (0-9), mild (10−12), moderate (13−20), severe (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), and extremely severe depression (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42). Anxiety was assessed from questions 2, 4, 7, 9, 15, 19, and 20.…”
Section: Psychological Health (Depression Anxiety and Stress)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After all questionnaires were reviewed by two graduate students, EpiData3.1 was used to input data, python software was used to explore the status quo of PTP, SPSS19.0 software was used for analysis [26], frequency and percentage of counting data were used for statistical description, and chi-squared test was used to compare the differences of PBPTP among different demographic characteristics. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%