2021
DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_113_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on the Characterization of Multiphoton Microscopy Images for Malignant Neoplastic Colon Lesion Detection under Deep Learning Methods

Abstract: Background: Colorectal cancer has a high incidence rate worldwide, with over 1.8 million new cases and 880,792 deaths in 2018. Fortunately, its early detection significantly increases the survival rate, reaching a cure rate of 90% when diagnosed at a localized stage. Colonoscopy is the gold standard technique for detection and removal of colorectal lesions with potential to evolve into cancer. When polyps are found in a patient, the current procedure is their complete removal. However, in this pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of handcrafted feature-based models versus automated deep learning models also showed the superiority of unsupervised training in classification models, rather than feature-based classification [ 53 ]. Another point raised by several authors, regarding the comparison of different classification models, is the quality of the initial annotation by the pathologist, which can influence solely the malignancy-containing slides [ 28 , 48 ]. Furthermore, the direct comparison of different models and classification architectures is further hindered by the variability of the tissue itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of handcrafted feature-based models versus automated deep learning models also showed the superiority of unsupervised training in classification models, rather than feature-based classification [ 53 ]. Another point raised by several authors, regarding the comparison of different classification models, is the quality of the initial annotation by the pathologist, which can influence solely the malignancy-containing slides [ 28 , 48 ]. Furthermore, the direct comparison of different models and classification architectures is further hindered by the variability of the tissue itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate identification of benign from malignant tissues achieved a sensitivity of 0.8228 and specificity of 0.9114 by a DL model trained with Multiphoton microscopy (MPM) images, although images were lacking biomarkers such as colonic crypts and goblet cells [51]. Holland et al used the same classification model and 7 training datasets consisting of a descending number of images [52].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of longer photons allows deeper tissue penetration and visualisation up to a depth of several hundred microns[ 232 ]. Recently, Terradillos et al [ 233 ] developed an AI system for interpretation of multiphoton microscopy images of colorectal polyps, with a specificity of 91% and sensitivity of 82% for malignant colorectal lesions. Further study is clearly required into the application of this technology, however the greater depth of visualisation may allow in vivo assessment of invasion depth for submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Polyp Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%