2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.212-213.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on Effect of Spatial Distribution of Rainfall on Runoff Modeling in Xixi Watershed of Jinjiang Basin

Abstract: The effect of spatial distribution of rainfall is considered to be main uncertain factor for hydrologic simulation. Based on calibration and validation of the SWAT model, using the 15 rainfall stations data ,analyzed the effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on runoff modeling in Xixi Watershed of Jinjiang basin. The results show that the difference of the rainfall spatial distribution is very obvious by calculating standard deviation. The effect of the difference of rainfall spatial distribution to simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the foregoing models, the SWAT model was chosen for this study, because it has gained international recognition as is evidenced by a large number of applications and has shown the success of hydrologic simulation with scarce data, and because it is especially applicable for large complex watersheds (Neitsch et al 2002). However, SWAT model presented also some limitations inherent in distributed hydrological models, as its sensitivity to the DEM resolution (Chaplot 2005;Chaubey et al 2005;Lin et al 2010), to subbasin size (Jha et al 2004;Arabi et al 2006;Mosbahi et al 2009;Gong et al 2010), to spatial distribution of rainfall Cho et al 2009;Gao et al 2012) and to input parameters (Spruill et al 2000;Francos et al 2003;Van Griensven et al 2006;Chahinian et al 2011;Fiseha et al 2013;Sellami et al 2013;Aouissi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among the foregoing models, the SWAT model was chosen for this study, because it has gained international recognition as is evidenced by a large number of applications and has shown the success of hydrologic simulation with scarce data, and because it is especially applicable for large complex watersheds (Neitsch et al 2002). However, SWAT model presented also some limitations inherent in distributed hydrological models, as its sensitivity to the DEM resolution (Chaplot 2005;Chaubey et al 2005;Lin et al 2010), to subbasin size (Jha et al 2004;Arabi et al 2006;Mosbahi et al 2009;Gong et al 2010), to spatial distribution of rainfall Cho et al 2009;Gao et al 2012) and to input parameters (Spruill et al 2000;Francos et al 2003;Van Griensven et al 2006;Chahinian et al 2011;Fiseha et al 2013;Sellami et al 2013;Aouissi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%