2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on demand: Instantaneous soundness checking of industrial business process models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The systems were selected from a collection of 735 models [27]. To ensure that each system has a unique terminal marking, unsound systems [28] were filtered out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systems were selected from a collection of 735 models [27]. To ensure that each system has a unique terminal marking, unsound systems [28] were filtered out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality issues like the deadlock in Figure 1 can be efficiently found for different classes of process models. Languages, like BPMN, EPCs, or UML Activity Diagrams, that can be mapped to free-choice Petri nets can be checked for soundness in quadratic time [17], structured models in linear time [18]. There are also techniques available for checking the correctness of data flow [19,20,21], satisfiability of constraints on the resource perspective [22,23,24], or the interoperability of cross-organizational workflows [25].…”
Section: Perspectives On Process Model Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 5 proceeds with the analysis of activity labels of action-noun (of ) style (lines [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The label part preceding preposition of is recognized as an action.…”
Section: Derivation Of Action and Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our implementation translates business process models described in the IBM WebSphere Business Modeler language into workflow graphs [10] and then applies a completion technique by Kiepuszewski et al [17] (cf. also [10]) to obtain a workflow graph with a unique sink, as required by our technique.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental study [10] has shown that whereas naive state-space exploration is not sufficient to analyze the state spaces of business process models, with appropriate reduction techniques, state space exploration can check soundness of an industrial process model in less than a second. However, the traces obtained can be large and contain many transitions that do not contribute to the actual control-flow error [11], which requires additional techniques to trim the trace [12,13], whereas our structural error patterns represent control-flow errors concisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%