2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of windbreaker combinations on steam power plant natural draft dry cooling towers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooling towers are classified based on different characteristics, although the following are the major ones: o Combination of wet-dry (hybrid) (Figure 3) (Zavaragh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cooling Towers Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooling towers are classified based on different characteristics, although the following are the major ones: o Combination of wet-dry (hybrid) (Figure 3) (Zavaragh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cooling Towers Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to improve the distribution of the internal aerodynamic field by installing windbreak walls at the bottom of the NDDCT. The common types are three-leaf and cross-windbreak walls [7], and their mechanism is to eliminate the vortex in the tower generated by the crosswind [8]. And this effect is more obvious as the wind velocity increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the traditional windbreaker first recommended by Preez and Kröger [11], Chen et al [12] subsequently presented the interior and exterior windbreaker configurations with a numerical simulation, showing that the exterior windbreakers were superior to the interior ones, especially at high wind speeds. Furthermore, Zavaragh et al [13] numerically proposed the internal flat and the combination of internal flat-external rounded windbreakers, which can move axially around the cooling tower, leading to the air mass flow rate increase from the wind momentum effect. Moreover, Gu et al [14] investigated the optimization of different wind-break structures, as the cross walls, wind-break walls, cross line-screen, and the louvers, concluding the most optimal structure is the wind-break wall, and the optimal louver opening as the second option, owing to its flexible adjustment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%