2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2004.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of virtual-time complexity in weighted fair queuing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This complexity is in addition to the inherent complexity of computing virtual times for these algorithms [21]. We have also shown in [17] that, in a singe rate WLAN, fair algorithms such as SFQ that use start time scheduling have an advantage over WFQ and WF 2 Q.…”
Section: Delay Bound Analysis Of Caps-sfqmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This complexity is in addition to the inherent complexity of computing virtual times for these algorithms [21]. We have also shown in [17] that, in a singe rate WLAN, fair algorithms such as SFQ that use start time scheduling have an advantage over WFQ and WF 2 Q.…”
Section: Delay Bound Analysis Of Caps-sfqmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…h Lemma 6. In a dynamic multirate SFQ the time it takes to serve the traffic of set E1 is less than V 2 À V 1 for V 1 and V 2 as described in (21).…”
Section: Delay Bound Of Throughput Fair Sfq In Dynamic Multirate Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure this, the scheduler uses a global variable known as h(t) virtual time. The variable's responsibility is to maintain a record of scheduler's work [29]. The virtual time is represented in equation 1 as:…”
Section: Fairness Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as aforementioned, GPS is impractical because several packets from different traffic flows receive services simultaneously in GPS. On the contrary, in realistic networks a scheduler must complete or terminate the service of an entire packet from a flow before turning to the next flow [1], [7]. For this reason, many packet-based scheduling disciplines have been proposed to approximate the GPS scheduling mechanism in the open literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To provide differentiated QoS, weight-based scheduling principles including the well-known Generalized Process Sharing (GPS) [11] and Weighted Fair Queueing (WFQ) [1] have been proposed. In GPS, each traffic flow is assigned a fixed weight that can guarantee a minimum service rate even though other traffic flows may be greedy in demanding service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%