2000
DOI: 10.1039/a908813j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of variance in forensic glass analysis by ICP-MS: variance within the method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have reported that comparisons of elemental compositions are useful for the forensic discrimination of glass fragments, 5,6,8,9,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and it is not pointed out again in this paper. What should be emphasized here is that a good correlation was observed in the elemental profiles between the non-heated and heated fragments in any of the 5 glasses.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Elemental Composition Between Heated And Nmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of studies have reported that comparisons of elemental compositions are useful for the forensic discrimination of glass fragments, 5,6,8,9,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and it is not pointed out again in this paper. What should be emphasized here is that a good correlation was observed in the elemental profiles between the non-heated and heated fragments in any of the 5 glasses.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Elemental Composition Between Heated And Nmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The forensic glass comparison mentioned above has been conducted by measuring the refractive index (RI) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and conducting an analysis of the elemental compositions using procedures such as X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), 6,8,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) 8,15,[23][24][25] and mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). 5,6,9,12,18,[26][27][28][29] An RI measurement can be applied to a glass fragment smaller than 0.1 mm in a maximum width without its destruction. This method has another advantage of simple sample preparation and short measurement time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scientific Working Group on Materials Analysis (SWGMAT) has also issued a guide for applying SEM to forensic paint examinations [3]. SEM-EDS is capable of detecting elements present in concentrations greater than 0.1% [4], allowing for major and minor element qualitative concentration determinations, lacking the sensitivity for trace analysis [5]. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is an additional tool available in some forensic laboratories but few published studies exist in the field of forensic paint analysis using the method [6,7], including a recent review [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) also has the ability to detect elements present in the paint matrix, but unlike SEM-EDS, the technique has the potential for trace elemental analysis.. Elemental profiling by ICP-MS has been shown to lead to excellent power of discrimination between glass fragments from different sources and to excellent power of association between fragments originating from the same source [5,9,10]. The use of the laser for solid-sampling introduction to the ICP-MS has gained wide acceptance and use as evidenced by the many recent publications [11,12,13,14,15,16] including a recent review chapter by Günther and Mermet [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICP methods benefit from features such as nearly simultaneous multielemental capability, reduced matrix interference effects, wide linear dynamic ranges, and excellent precision and sensitivity. These attributes result in superior discrimination power compared to other methods of glass analysis [MoenkeBlankenburg et al, 1992;, Wolnik et al, 1989, Zurhaar et al, 1990Parouchais et al, 1996;Duckworth et al, 2000].…”
Section: Forensic Examinations Of Glassmentioning
confidence: 99%