Analysis of US semiconductor collaboration

Gover, J.

doi:10.1109/17.277402

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trust and norms are multilevel concepts that apply to both the interpersonal and the inter‐organisational level of analysis (Rousseau, 1985; Rousseau et al , 1998; Möllering, 2006; Seppänen et al ., 2007). Gover (1993) notes that commercialisation success in product and process improvement requires strong relationships. In order to build such relationships it is necessary to initiate both interpersonal and inter‐organisational relational governance in order to produce value.…”

Section: Relational and Contractual Governance Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects

Olander

Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

Blomqvist

et al. 2010

Knowl Process Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to explore the dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in vertical buyer-supplier R&D projects requiring both knowledge sharing and protection. Prior literature has recognised the mutual impact of relational and contractual governance on knowledge sharing, but treats the linkages in a rather static way. This research introduces a more explicit process perspective, and combines four concepts: trust, relational norms, contracts and intellectual property rights (IPRs). The paper concentrates on the roles and interplay of both types of mechanisms in the different project phases. We collected qualitative interview data from four buyer-supplier R&D collaboration projects, each pair serving as a unit of analysis. Our findings indicate that both contractual and relational governance mechanisms play a role in buyer-supplier R&D collaboration but their relative importance varies according to the collaboration phase. Whereas in the exploration phase trust may even substitute contractual governance, both mechanisms support each other in the development phase. Contractual mechanisms are emphasised in the finalisation phase, although relational mechanisms also play a role. The lesson for management understanding is that both types of mechanisms should be considered simultaneously throughout the collaboration process.

show abstract

Section: Relational and Contractual Governance Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects

Olander

Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

Blomqvist

et al. 2010

Knowl Process Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consequently, if companies inhabit di!erent contexts, it is likely that there will be di!erences in the classes of their core organizational knowledge, requiring di!erent knowledge management processes. From this perspective, Figure 2, adapted from Gover (1993), demonstrates that, while all organizations need to have knowledge processes working e$ciently within their organizations, the nature and purpose of such processes will di!er depending on the stage of the market, and its sector. Note that in Figure 2, for &competences' we insert &knowledge', with the same meaning.…”

Section: The Need To Differentiate Knowledge Lifecycle Management Promentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Kantor/Gomory/Gover model of the marketplace (Gover, 1993), showing di!erent drivers for knowledge management processes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational aspects of knowledge lifecycle management in manufacturing

Siemieniuch¹,

Sinclair²

1999

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

11.4.1 Systems of Systems (SoS) Engineering: a view from the inside looking out

Siemieniuch

Sinclair

2012

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The paper provides a human factors based perspective on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), different to that usually encountered in the military and civilian arenas. This reflects the evident fact that the vast majority of System of Systems (SoS) are created, configured, controlled, supervised, maintained, upgraded and decommissioned by humans. The paper commences by outlining what an SoS feels like from the inside, and then goes on to outline a selection of issues of importance to SoS engineering and performance stated from a human factors perspective. These include tipping points, incomplete knowledge, SoS immortality, complexity, and the importance of trustworthy behaviour within the SoS. Some design approaches to address these issues are then outlined.

show abstract

Analysis of US semiconductor collaboration

Cited by 14 publications

References 18 publications

The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects

The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects

Organizational aspects of knowledge lifecycle management in manufacturing

11.4.1 Systems of Systems (SoS) Engineering: a view from the inside looking out

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About