Analysis of UAV multicopter of air photography in New Yogyakarta International Airports

Suroso, Indreswari; Irmawan, Erwhin

doi:10.12928/telkomnika.v17i1.9255

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The timeout should be sufficient for at least allowing the operator to land his drone safely. Safe landing takes place at low speeds in the range of a couple of meters per second, e.g., 4 m/sec as reported in [36]. So, if the drone is at an altitude of 100m, the landing would take around 25 seconds.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Integrating Counter-UAS Systems into the UTM System for Reliable Decision Making

Abdulhadi¹,

Shoufan²,

Ruba³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite significant progress, the deployment of UAV technology in commercial and civil applications is still lagging. This is essentially due to the risks associated with drone flights and the lack of coordinated technologies that would mitigate these risks. While Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management systems (UTM) are being developed worldwide to enable safe operation, the counter-drone technology operates on an all-enemy basis and regards any sighted drone as a threat. This situation is essentially caused by the lack of information exchange between stakeholders. Without the exchange of relevant information, a counter-drone system can misclassify drones and initiate erroneous interdiction procedures. This paper proposes a system that integrates counter-drone technology into the UTM system for information exchange and coordination using a set of clarification protocols towards accountable response to sighted drones. The system functionality and performance were evaluated by simulation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Integrating Counter-UAS Systems into the UTM System for Reliable Decision Making

Abdulhadi¹,

Shoufan²,

Ruba³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Saat ini, Quadcopter banyak dimanfaatkan untuk berbagai keperluan, termasuk pemantauan perbatasan, pengambilan foto udara dalam bidang fotografi, pemantauan cuaca di suatu wilayah dalam bidang geografi, dan sebagai alat untuk memantau kondisi di sekitar daerah bencana dari jarak jauh. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Quadcopter merupakan jenis pesawat udara yang memiliki sayap putar (rotary wing) dan ditenagai oleh motor brushless DC (BLDC).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Kendali Pid Pada Quadcopter Untuk Gerak Attitude Pitch Dan Roll Saat Hovering

Nugroho,

Khairurozi,

Suprijono

et al. 2024

elektrika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quadcopter represents one of the emerging research areas in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology. One of its advantages lies in its simple mechanism and smaller propeller size compared to helicopters, while maintaining the same lifting capacity. The quadcopter employs inner and outer control schemes, where the inner control manages attitude roll, pitch, yaw, and altitude, thereby affecting the motion of the quadcopter. Meanwhile, the outer control governs the direction of the quadcopter's movement. This condition underscores the significance of inner control, ensuring the quadcopter's maneuverability. Consequently, there is a need to design an attitude, pitch, and roll control using the PID method. This experiment focuses on roll and pitch control under hover conditions. The PID control experiment yielded optimal results with parameters KP = 60, KI = 22, and KD = 14, exhibiting rapid response, absence of oscillation, deviations smaller than 20o in both roll and pitch controls, and the ability to return the attitude to the initial setpoint position when disturbances occur. Keywords: Attitude, hovering, PID controller, quadcopter. ABSTRAKQuadcopter merupakan salah satu bidang riset yang baru dalam teknologi unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Salah satu keunggulan pada Quadcopter adalah mekanisme yang sederhana dan ukuran pada baling-baling yang lebih kecil dibandingkan dengan helicopter dengan daya angkat yang sama. Quadcopter memiliki skema kendali inner dan kendali outer, dimana kendali inner mengendalikan attitude roll, pitch, yaw, dan altitude yang berimplikasi pada gerak quadcopter. Sedangkan kendali outer mengendalikan arah gerak quadcopter. Kondisi ini menjadikan kendali inner sangat penting sehingga mampu menjaga quadcopter dapat bergerak. Untuk itu perlu dirancang suatu kendali attitude pitch dan roll dengan metode PID. Eksperimen ini focus pada kendali roll dan pitch di kondisi hover. Hasil eksperimen kendali PID pada roll dan pitch didapatkan hasil terbaik pada parameter KP=60, KI=22, dan KD=14 yang memiliki respon cepat, tidak terjadi osilasi, lonjakan lebih kecil dari 20o baik pada kendali roll maupun pitch, dan mampu mengembalikan attitude pada posisi setpoint awal apabila diberi gangguan.<div id="gtx-trans" style="position: absolute; left: -26px; top: 21px;"> </div>

show abstract

“…• When the decision is to interdict the drone after a timeout, then t out should be around what an operator typically needs to stop the mission, e.g., by landing the drone safely. Landing a drone takes place at low speeds, e.g., 4 m/sec according to [49]. So, if a multirotor drone flies at an altitude of 100 meters, the landing would take around 25 seconds.…”

Section: System Simulation and Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contingency Clarification Protocols for Reliable Counter-Drone Operation

Shoufan,

Damiani

2023

IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Counter-drone technology plays a vital role in protecting airspace against unwanted and malicious drones. Counterdrone systems increasingly rely on unmanned traffic management services, such as remote identification and flight authorization enforcement, for the detection and mitigation of unauthorized activities on the part of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). These services support automated drone identification and verification of the drone activity's compliance before taking any enforcement action. Available drone identification standards like ASTM F3411-22 for Drone Remote Identification (DRI) specify key requirements for entities involved in UAV operations. However, DRI systems can fail for many technical and non-technical reasons related to the drone itself, its operator, the identification system, other involved service suppliers, or the communication between these actors. On the other hand, experience has shown that even licensed drone operators can violate permitted flight parameters mistakenly or for unavoidable reasons. In such contingency situations, the counter-drone system should perform additional checks and interact with relevant agents before classifying the drone as illegal and taking action against it. This paper presents a set of protocols to formalize the interaction between the counter-drone system and relevant agents to clarify possible failures and violations. The goal is to complement current DRI systems mitigating the effect of erroneous drone identification and supporting reliable decision-making. The simulation of worst-case scenarios shows that executing the clarification protocols takes just a few seconds, and this delay is only notable in situations where immediate action is required to neutralize illegal drones.

show abstract

Analysis of UAV multicopter of air photography in New Yogyakarta International Airports

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

Integrating Counter-UAS Systems into the UTM System for Reliable Decision Making

Integrating Counter-UAS Systems into the UTM System for Reliable Decision Making

Kendali Pid Pada Quadcopter Untuk Gerak Attitude Pitch Dan Roll Saat Hovering

Contingency Clarification Protocols for Reliable Counter-Drone Operation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About