2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of two parameter identification methods for original and modified Johnson-Cook fracture strains, including numerical comparison and validation of a new blue-brittle dependent fracture model for free-cutting steel 50SiB8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…giving the coefficient m. The fitted curve is shown in red in figure 7. For the temperatures T = 20 • C and T = 200 • C the fit lies in the scatter band of the measured data, while it predicts higher yield stresses at T = 400 • C and T = 800 • C. At T = 600 • C the yield stress is predicted too low as the scatter of the experimental data is very large and ranges from ≈ 65% to 100% of the yield stress at T = 20 • C. This issue is probably due to blue brittleness as discussed in [7]. The classic Johnson-Cook temperature term is not able to correctly describe this behaviour and the curve fit is worsened before and after this peak.…”
Section: Parameter Mmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…giving the coefficient m. The fitted curve is shown in red in figure 7. For the temperatures T = 20 • C and T = 200 • C the fit lies in the scatter band of the measured data, while it predicts higher yield stresses at T = 400 • C and T = 800 • C. At T = 600 • C the yield stress is predicted too low as the scatter of the experimental data is very large and ranges from ≈ 65% to 100% of the yield stress at T = 20 • C. This issue is probably due to blue brittleness as discussed in [7]. The classic Johnson-Cook temperature term is not able to correctly describe this behaviour and the curve fit is worsened before and after this peak.…”
Section: Parameter Mmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…• The thermal softening is captured well, except for temperatures around T = 600 • C. Using a modified temperature dependent term, as for example in [14] or [7], could potentially capture this peak as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the process and laser parameter in conjunction with the experimentally measured Archimedean density, melt pool depth and crack density are used from section 3.2, to find the corresponding function between each of the Π -terms with curve fitting. Further information about the least square fit approach for curve fitting can be found in the research of Gerstgrasser et al [39]. In case of the first system, a linear relation between the dimensionless 1 Π and 2 Π -term is observed, as presented in Fig.…”
Section: Crack Density Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%