2004
DOI: 10.5897/ajb2004.000-2040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Tunisian date palm germplasm using simple sequence repeat primers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
35
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) were used for date palm cultivar identification (Corniquel and Mercier, 1994), however the technique was considered laborious and unsuitable for studying large numbers of samples. Other molecular markers including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Sedra et al, 1998;Soliman et al, 2003;Williams et al, 1990), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) (Hamza et al, 2013;Hamza et al, 2012), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Al-Khalifah and Askari, 2003;Cao and Chao, 2002;El-assar et al, 2005;Elassar et al, 2003); simple sequence repeat (SSR) (Ahmed and AlQaradawi, 2009;Al-Ruqaishi et al, 2008;Elsafi, 2012;Elshibli and Korpelainen, 2008;Pintaud et al, 2010;Zehdi et al, 2004;Zehdi et al, 2012;Zehdi-Azouzi et al, 2015;Zehdi-Azouzi et al, 2016), chloroplast DNA analysis (Sakka et al, 2013;Rhouma-Chatti et al, 2014) and inter-primer binding site (iPBS) (Al-Najm et al, 2016) were used to assess the genetic diversity of date palm germplasm collected from a variety of countries. Other researchers used a combination of these marker systems to study the genetic diversity of date palm germplasm (Abdulla and Gamal, 2010;Adawy et al, 2005;Hussein et al, 2005;Saker et al, 2006;Saker et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) were used for date palm cultivar identification (Corniquel and Mercier, 1994), however the technique was considered laborious and unsuitable for studying large numbers of samples. Other molecular markers including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Sedra et al, 1998;Soliman et al, 2003;Williams et al, 1990), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) (Hamza et al, 2013;Hamza et al, 2012), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Al-Khalifah and Askari, 2003;Cao and Chao, 2002;El-assar et al, 2005;Elassar et al, 2003); simple sequence repeat (SSR) (Ahmed and AlQaradawi, 2009;Al-Ruqaishi et al, 2008;Elsafi, 2012;Elshibli and Korpelainen, 2008;Pintaud et al, 2010;Zehdi et al, 2004;Zehdi et al, 2012;Zehdi-Azouzi et al, 2015;Zehdi-Azouzi et al, 2016), chloroplast DNA analysis (Sakka et al, 2013;Rhouma-Chatti et al, 2014) and inter-primer binding site (iPBS) (Al-Najm et al, 2016) were used to assess the genetic diversity of date palm germplasm collected from a variety of countries. Other researchers used a combination of these marker systems to study the genetic diversity of date palm germplasm (Abdulla and Gamal, 2010;Adawy et al, 2005;Hussein et al, 2005;Saker et al, 2006;Saker et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three loci i.e. mpdCIRO78, mpdCIRO85 and mpdCIRO25 were found to be polymorphic among 49 accessions of date palm cultivars from Tunisia (Zehdi et al, 2004), while on the other hand, these markers were unable to confirm the genetic identity and true to typeness of 60 date palm accessions from Sudan (Elshibli and Korpelainen, 2008), 45 cultivars from Pakistan (Faqir et al, 2016), and 12 cultivars from Qatar (Elmeer and Mattat, 2015). Ten SSR primers (mPdCIR010,mPdCIR016,mPdCIR025,mPdCIR032,mPdCIR035,mPdCIR044,mPdCIR070,mPdCIR085,mPdCIR090 and mPdCIR093) resulted in unique fingerprints for the important genotypes of date palm from Oman (AlRuqaishi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Date Palm Diversity Evaluation Based On Simple Sequence Repementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers have to be developed for each species, from genomic regions that have undergone sufficiently rapid evolutionary change, in order to be useful for discriminating among closely-related germplasm (Cheng et al, 2002;Zehdi et al, 2004;Prasad, 2014;Daudu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Among Hibiscus Genotypes Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%