2014
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.4.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore appropriate treatment modality of microinvasive cervical cancer (MIC) and to analyze prognosis and risk factors of recurrence.MethodsA cohort of 324 Chinese patients with MIC diagnosed and treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic features, treatment modalities, pathologic parameters, risk factors of residual disease, survival and risk factors of recurrence were analyzed.ResultsOf all patients, 280 cases were staged IA1 and 44 cases staged IA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Creasman et al in 1985 reported LVSI in a cohort of stage IA cervical cancers that was intermediate: 10.8% for stage IA1 and 33.3% for stage IA2 6. Most recent studies cite LVSI positivity under 8% for stage IA1 disease and anywhere from 11.4% to 33.3% for stage IA2 disease 8–11 13 14. In our cohort, LVSI positivity was seen in 10.5% of those with stage IA1 disease and 18.8% of those with stage IA2 disease, which falls within the range of prevalence previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Creasman et al in 1985 reported LVSI in a cohort of stage IA cervical cancers that was intermediate: 10.8% for stage IA1 and 33.3% for stage IA2 6. Most recent studies cite LVSI positivity under 8% for stage IA1 disease and anywhere from 11.4% to 33.3% for stage IA2 disease 8–11 13 14. In our cohort, LVSI positivity was seen in 10.5% of those with stage IA1 disease and 18.8% of those with stage IA2 disease, which falls within the range of prevalence previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Prior studies of women with microinvasive cervical cancer have reported LVSI rates of 2.8%–21.6% 4–14. In 1979, Sedlis and colleagues observed LVSI in 19.6% of patients with ‘microinvasive carcinoma’ with a depth of invasion <3 mm and in 43% of cases with depth of invasion 3–5 mm, corresponding to contemporary stage IA1 and IA2 disease 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11Y13 Treatment plan for MIC without LVSI should also consider the risk of invasive disease in the residual cervix and risk of recurrence, and the most important parameters to define treatment extension and prognosis in those cases are depth of stromal invasion, conization margin involvement, and residual disease after cervical conization. 9,14Y16 Although it has been suggested by several retrospective studies that MIC has excellent prognosis and less radical surgery could be considered for these cases, 3,8,9,16 data regarding the risk and extent of residual disease in these settings are not uniform at this time. In the present study, we report a cohort of 139 women with MIC without LVSI treated conservatively or not and followed up to 20 years to explore appropriate treatment modality and analyze the prognosis and risk factors for recurrence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Lymphovascular space involvement is rare in stage IA1, and its presence does not affect FIGO stage, though it is said to be a risk factor for recurrence. 9,40 To date, the impact of LVSI on the prognosis of micorinvasive carcinomas is controversial. 9 In some centers, patients with stage IA1 cancer that show positive LVSI from diagnostic conization, definitive conization is carried out preceded by lymphadenectomy; nodal involvement is confirmed with frozen section.…”
Section: Conizationmentioning
confidence: 99%