“…In this regard, the study of transpression (and transtension) zones helps us to better understand crustal 3D kinematics, as deduced from many field-based studies (e.g., Díaz-Azpiroz and Fern� andez, 2005;Zanchi et al, 2016;Nabavi et al, 2017bNabavi et al, , 2017cSimonetti et al, 2018;Bergh et al, 2019;Alonso-Henar et al, 2020), as well as analytical (e.g., Fossen et al, 1994;Fossen and Tikoff, 1998;Jones et al, 2004;Jiang, 2007;Fern� andez and Díaz-Azpiroz, 2009;Díaz-Azpiroz et al, 2019) (Fig. 1), analogue (e.g., Tikoff and Peterson, 1998;Casas et al, 2001;Leever et al, 2011;Ghosh et al, 2014;Barcos et al, 2016;Sadeghi et al, 2016), and numerical (e.g., Davis et al, 2013;Nevitt et al, 2014Nevitt et al, , 2017Dasgupta et al, 2015;Frehner, 2016;Nabavi et al, 2017aNabavi et al, , 2018aNabavi et al, , 2018bNabavi et al, , 2019 models. In essentially ductile transpressional zones both simple shearing and coaxial flow are commonly present within the entire shear zone producing complex finite deformation geometries (e.g., Alsop et al, 1998;Mazzoli, 2008, 2015;Davis and Titus, 2011;Fern� andez et al, 2013;Fossen and Cavalcante, 2017;Carreras and Druguet, 2019).…”