2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards – Insights from a Colombian case

Abstract: This study provides an applied framework to derive the connectivity reliability and vulnerability of interurban transportation systems under network disruptions. The proposed model integrates statistical reliability analysis to find the reliability and vulnerability of transportation networks. Most of the modern research in this field has focused on urban transportation networks where the primary concerns are guaranteeing predefined standards of capacity and travel time. However, at a regional and national lev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies focused on road networks lacking transport demand data (Bell et al 2017), subway networks under random failures (Angeloudis and Fisk 2006), country-level ocean container networks (Calatayud et al 2017) and power grids exposed to targeted attacks (Ouyang et al 2014). Comprehensive reviews of previous works on vulnerability assessment for various types of transport networks, disruption sources, and the evaluation of related terms such as resilience and reliability are also available (Mattsson and Jenelius 2015;Reggiani et al 2015;Hosseini et al 2016).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies focused on road networks lacking transport demand data (Bell et al 2017), subway networks under random failures (Angeloudis and Fisk 2006), country-level ocean container networks (Calatayud et al 2017) and power grids exposed to targeted attacks (Ouyang et al 2014). Comprehensive reviews of previous works on vulnerability assessment for various types of transport networks, disruption sources, and the evaluation of related terms such as resilience and reliability are also available (Mattsson and Jenelius 2015;Reggiani et al 2015;Hosseini et al 2016).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khademi et al (2015) reviewed the methods related to the vulnerability of transport networks due to natural disasters, concluding that accessibility indexes often serve as indicators of network vulnerability. Muriel-Villegas et al (2016) classified the available approaches for transport network reliability to natural disasters in three main areas, namely connectivity reliability, performance reliability, and vulnerability. An overview of network vulnerability analysis, classified to scenario-specific, strategy-specific, simulation, and mathematical modelling approaches is provided in Murray et al (2008), while the methods and challenges in modelling and simulation of interconnected infrastructure are discussed by Eusgeld et al (2011) and Ouyang (2014).…”
Section: Qra At a Network Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A criticality assessment of infrastructure network components enables the identification of components whose failure has a high potential to cause spreading effects on the overall system. The criticality level of a component depends on its role in the network structure and flow . In this study, three approaches are used to evaluate the criticality level of each component, namely, the edge betweenness method (i.e., topological criticality), network efficiency indices (i.e., efficiency criticality), and the input–output (I–O) modeling method (i.e., capacity criticality).…”
Section: Risk Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%