2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of transitional flow in 3D geometries using a novel phenomenological model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and it has been the main incentive for many researchers ( [19][20][21]). Kubacki and Dick [22] presented a simple algebraic model for laminar to turbulent transition Unsteady boundary layer transition on oscillating airfoils has been characterised for a range of pitch rates and Reynolds numbers using hot-film anemometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it has been the main incentive for many researchers ( [19][20][21]). Kubacki and Dick [22] presented a simple algebraic model for laminar to turbulent transition Unsteady boundary layer transition on oscillating airfoils has been characterised for a range of pitch rates and Reynolds numbers using hot-film anemometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vizhinho et al [22] developed a transition model based on SA and pretransitional quantities (V-SA). The experiments were compared against the baseline SA, γRe θ model, and the developed V-SA transition model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case is of particular interest because the three-dimensional nature of the flow around spheroids leads to strong crossflow instabilities that dominate the transition process, which makes it a solid validation case for transition models that try to capture crossflow effects. First efforts (Nebel et al [157], Stock [158]) considered boundary layer transition using the e N method, whereas more recently the focus has shifted towards the available transport equation transition models (Langtry et al [92], Grabe et al [115][13], Denison et al [159], Vallinayagam Pillai et al [160], Choi et al [116][117], Vizinho et al [161]). Due to the presence of crossflow effects, this case has also been suggested as a standard transition model validation case [149].…”
Section: Two-dimensional Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%