“…Such an analysis may yield good curve fitting, but will obtain fitting parameters that are inaccurate. For example, in previous works, Rios et al 15,29,31 showed that CA simulations with non-randomly located nuclei yield a fitted value of the number of nuclei per unit of volume, N V , and a time exponent for the velocity from Equation 6 that were different from the number of nuclei per unit of volume and time exponent used in the simulation. Consequently, in the present work, the fact that we reproduced experimental results using quantities extracted from analytical models validates the CA simulation and the analytical treatment by V&R. However, in studies in which one has less experimental data this could become an issue.…”