2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-019-01148-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Transform-Based Features on Lateral View Breast Thermograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ak [ 33 ] discussed various approaches of machine learning and applied them to the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WBCD) dataset, focusing on comparative analysis and data visualization. Jeyanathan et al [ 34 ] extracted features from breast thermograms using wavelet, curvelet, and contourlet transform for breast cancer recognition, achieving an accuracy of 91%, a sensitivity of 87%, and a specificity of 90% using the AdaBoost classifier. Abdar et al [ 35 ] used voting and stacking techniques to construct a two-layer nested ensemble (NE) model with single classifiers (naïve Bayes and BayesNet), which was tested on the WDBC dataset, achieving an accuracy of 98.07%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ak [ 33 ] discussed various approaches of machine learning and applied them to the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WBCD) dataset, focusing on comparative analysis and data visualization. Jeyanathan et al [ 34 ] extracted features from breast thermograms using wavelet, curvelet, and contourlet transform for breast cancer recognition, achieving an accuracy of 91%, a sensitivity of 87%, and a specificity of 90% using the AdaBoost classifier. Abdar et al [ 35 ] used voting and stacking techniques to construct a two-layer nested ensemble (NE) model with single classifiers (naïve Bayes and BayesNet), which was tested on the WDBC dataset, achieving an accuracy of 98.07%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining the table closely, it becomes clear that the proposed approach performs better than the others. The proposed method outperforms the ones in reference 42 by 5.4%, 11.1%, and 6.9%, respectively; in connection, 43 by 1.7%, 9.24%, and 2.16%; in reference, 44 by 1.9%, 1.3%, and 16.1%; and in contact, 45 by 5.7%, 5.1%, and 0.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Odmgc Validationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The cumulative distribution function corresponding to P V ( r a ) is represented as in equation, 33 SV=T()ra=j=0aPV()rj0.25ema=0,1,2,,L1 …”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the total number of pixels in the image, n a is the number of pixels that have gray level r a , L is the total number of possible gray levels in the image, P V ((r a ) vs r a is called a histogram. The cumulative distribution function corresponding to P V (r a ) is represented as in equation, 33 S V = T r a ð Þ= X a j = 0…”
Section: Self-adaptive Gray Level Histogram Equalization Based On Power Law Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation