2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of trace metals in comparison of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with LA-ICP-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute limits of detection achievable with LIBS are also far from unacceptable; they are already in the picogram-femtogram range and are soon expected to be further improved by signal enhancement and sub-micrometer sampling techniques. The comparison of the microsampling LIBS with bulk-sampling methods is often also meaningless, but nevertheless it has been repeatedly proved that LIBS can provide similar accuracy to that of either bulk-solid sampling (AAS, ICP-OES, XRF, and ICP-MS [64, [114][115][116]) or solid microsampling (μ-XRF, LA-ICP-MS [117][118][119]) methods, with the added benefit of being portable and available for remote measurements, etc. The calibration-free method of analysis (CF-LIBS), developed by Tognoni et al [120], is probably the quantitative method that has generated the most interest in the LIBS community over the years.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute limits of detection achievable with LIBS are also far from unacceptable; they are already in the picogram-femtogram range and are soon expected to be further improved by signal enhancement and sub-micrometer sampling techniques. The comparison of the microsampling LIBS with bulk-sampling methods is often also meaningless, but nevertheless it has been repeatedly proved that LIBS can provide similar accuracy to that of either bulk-solid sampling (AAS, ICP-OES, XRF, and ICP-MS [64, [114][115][116]) or solid microsampling (μ-XRF, LA-ICP-MS [117][118][119]) methods, with the added benefit of being portable and available for remote measurements, etc. The calibration-free method of analysis (CF-LIBS), developed by Tognoni et al [120], is probably the quantitative method that has generated the most interest in the LIBS community over the years.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some elements, there could be nonlinear effects at higher mass loadings as were seen for Na in Figure 7. the atomic concentration in the plasma volume and then reaches a plateau due to line-width broadening and self-absorption (Gornushkin et al 1999;Panne et al 2001;Meissner et al 2004). This nonlinear relationship between atomic concentration and LIBS signal intensity is more pronounced for resonance lines such as Na I line used in this study.…”
Section: System Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique features of laser radiation together with the ease of transmission of the optical analytical signal predisposes LIBS for in-situ and remote analysis and make this technique competitive with other spectrometric methods [6]. With its multi-elemental capability and spatial resolution, LIBS is regarded as a complementary technique to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) [7] or spark source optical emission spectrometry [8]. In addition to the benefits associated with direct solids analysis, LIBS can also be applied to the analysis of liquids [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%