2005
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of time‐dependent covariates in a regressive relative survival model

Abstract: Relative survival is a method for assessing prognostic factors for disease-specific mortality. However, most relative survival models assume that the effect of covariate on disease-specific mortality is fixed-in-time, which may not hold in some studies and requires adapted modelling. We propose an extension of the Esteve et al. regressive relative survival model that uses the counting process approach to accommodate time-dependent effect of a predictor's on disease-specific mortality. This approach had shown i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 In this model, RPM activation was a time-varying covariate to account for differences in the time from ICD implantation to first RPM transmission. The model accounted for clustering of the patients within hospitals through the inclusion of a hospitalspecific random effect that has a multiplicative effect on the baseline hazard function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 In this model, RPM activation was a time-varying covariate to account for differences in the time from ICD implantation to first RPM transmission. The model accounted for clustering of the patients within hospitals through the inclusion of a hospitalspecific random effect that has a multiplicative effect on the baseline hazard function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In the model, rehospitalizations were considered as potentially recurrent events and accounted for the same factors used in the survival analyses. In the rehospitalization models, patients were censored at the time point of last follow-up or death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method also accounted for adherence and duration of treatment. [21][22][23] We also assessed adherence to nonrestricted cardiovascular drugs by calculating the percentage of days on the same drug class during the follow-up period. Discrete data are presented as percentage, and continuous data are presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]) and median (25th-75th percentile) when nonnormally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding x l 4 〈 d 〉 as one of time-dependent covariate for the liver transplantation, one can test the significance of liver transplantation. The covariate for liver transplantation is taken as a binary variable (codes 0 before liver transplantation, 1 at liver transplantation) as shown in Giorgi and Gouvernet [16] and Crowley [37]. Table 6 shows the three types for the combination of “censored” and “liver transplantation.” Table 7 shows the values of covariates for liver-transplanted patient #5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportional hazard model (2) used the time-fixed values of covariates as shown in Dickson et al [1]. The estimates of hazard ratio by relative survival regression model [16] with time-dependent covariates are compared with that of Cox proportional hazard model. A new approach [17, 18] is proposed with PBC data, aiming to capture nonlinear patterns of bilirubin time courses and their relationship with survival time of patients.…”
Section: Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%