1999
DOI: 10.1007/s004660050456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of thin beams, using the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method, with generalized moving least squares interpolations

Abstract: In this paper, the conventional moving least squares interpolation scheme is generalized, to incorporate the information concerning the derivative of the ®eld variable into the interpolation scheme. By using this generalized moving least squares interpolation, along with the MLPG (Meshless Local Petrov±Galerkin) paradigm, a new numerical approach is proposed to deal with 4th order problems of thin beams. Through numerical examples, convergence tests are performed; and problems of thin beams under various loadi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
104
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present paper, the local subdomains are taken to be of a quadrature shape. The local weak form [20] [21] of the governing Equation (25) can be written as: …”
Section: The Mlpg Weak Formulation In Laplace-transformed Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present paper, the local subdomains are taken to be of a quadrature shape. The local weak form [20] [21] of the governing Equation (25) can be written as: …”
Section: The Mlpg Weak Formulation In Laplace-transformed Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method based on a local weak form and Moving Least Squares (MLS) approximation [15] [16] [17] [18]. The main advantage of this method over the widely used finite element methods (FEM) is that it does not need any mesh, either for the interpolation of the solution variables or for the integration of the weak forms [19] [20]. The MLPG method and its variations have been applied for elastodynamic and elastostatic problems by several authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame bending is modeled as a 2D continuum problem under plane stress conditions. This was considered more suitable than formulating a 1D beam (as employed by Atluri et al (1999), Donning and Liu (1997), and Suetake (2002)) because MLS shape functions would need to have cubic consistency in order to approximate both the displacement and rotation deformation fields. This causes increased difficulties in the meshfree formulation when trying to enforce displacement and slope boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the EBCs were enforced by an auxiliary method which was not stated explicitly. Atluri et al [1999] extended the conventional moving least squares (MLS) interpolant, first presented by Lancaster and Salkauskas [1981], to Hermite-type interpolation and called it generalized MLS (GMLS). For illustration, Atluri et al [1999] considered a one-dimensional thin beam and imposed the EBC using the penalty method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%