2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-006-0244-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the wave system of a catamaran for CFD validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, in fact, the C T curves (Fig. 7a), for all the s values, collapse on the mono-hull line and the separation distance does not have any influence on catamaran resistance, which is consistent with previous studies [6].…”
Section: Interferencesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, in fact, the C T curves (Fig. 7a), for all the s values, collapse on the mono-hull line and the separation distance does not have any influence on catamaran resistance, which is consistent with previous studies [6].…”
Section: Interferencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, differently from Souto-Iglesias et al [6] and from Broglia et al [24], in our computations negative IF values are not observed at Fr values near 0.35. As Fr increases, 0.35 \ Fr B 0.45, interference becomes large, owing to the larger differences between mono-hull and catamaran C T values, but with small influence of the separation distance.…”
Section: Interferencecontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, with further increase of Fr to 1.0, the interference factor was prone to decrease or even be omitted as displayed in Figure 6(d), Figure6(e) and Figure 6(f), as also reported by Molland et al [11]. Similar to what was reported by [29] this occurrence might be due to the favourable factor which resulted in the subsequent reduction of total resistance coefficient. It is convenient to explain here that the existence of the favourable interference factor has led to an attenuation of the viscous and pressure resistances.…”
Section: Effect Of Lateral Separation Ratio (S/l)supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The free model condition was then considered, making it more difficult to identify interference effects due to substantially different dynamic trims and sinkages between the mono-hull and the catamaran. 27 Larsson et al 28 simulated the motions of KCS2 and KVLCC2 tanker in head sea condition using RANS equations. Zaghi et al 29 used a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver to simulate multi-hulls instead and found a good agreement for the resistance values describing complex interference effects at high Froude number regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%