2018
DOI: 10.2478/ace-2018-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Void Volume Fraction for S235JR Steel at Failure for Low Initial Stress Triaxiality

Abstract: This paper deals with problems of failure mechanisms of S235JR structural steel. One of the fundamental parameters of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman damage mechanics-based material model is considered in order to describe the behaviour of the material at the plastic range. The analysis was performed on the void volume fraction fF determined at failure of S235JR steel. The case of low initial stress triaxiality η = 1/3 was taken into consideration. Different from the most popular methods such as curve-fitting, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many of them are in good technical condition, it is necessary to monitor their safety of use and check current load-carrying capacity. In this field, many sophisticated methods were developed [33][34][35][36], which allow us to analyse the stress and strain state in critical parts of the bridges prone to damage, as well as to predict the emergency and model time to failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of them are in good technical condition, it is necessary to monitor their safety of use and check current load-carrying capacity. In this field, many sophisticated methods were developed [33][34][35][36], which allow us to analyse the stress and strain state in critical parts of the bridges prone to damage, as well as to predict the emergency and model time to failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of f F corresponds to the criterion of material failure, and for metals ranges from 0.10–0.20. This can also be experimentally determined [ 30 ].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The f F value corresponds to the destruction of the material and for metals ranges from 0.10 to 0.20. It can also be determined from the relationship (3.6) or experimentally [24,26].…”
Section: Porous Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%