1999
DOI: 10.1109/59.801894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the value for unit commitment of improved load forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
109
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is estimated that a 1% decrease in forecasting error for a 10 GW electric utility can save up to 1.6% million annually [32].…”
Section: Computational Intelligence Based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that a 1% decrease in forecasting error for a 10 GW electric utility can save up to 1.6% million annually [32].…”
Section: Computational Intelligence Based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Hobbs et al (1999) estimates cost savings in electricity generation from better forecasts of electricity loads. In the Hobbs et al study, actual loads and forecasted loads were obtained for two utility systems-one northeastern and one southern.…”
Section: Cost Savings From Improved Elec-tricity Demand (Or Load) Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, our estimates of the relationship between the quality of temperature forecasts and the quality of electricity demand forecasts is presented for four different temperature forecasts at six sites around the United States. Using these results in conjunction with the Hobbs et al (1999) work makes it possible to estimate the cost savings from different temperature forecasts at these sites. These site-specific cost savings are then extrapolated to estimate total benefits, and incremental benefits, for the United States as a whole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Keeping a low balancing cost is important due to low profit margins in the industry. A conservative estimate by (Hobbs et al, 1999) shows that a decrease of the load forecasting error in terms of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 1 % lowers the variable production cost between 0.6 and 1.6 million USD annually for a 10,000 MW utility with MAPE around 4 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%