2003
DOI: 10.1121/1.1520538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the three-dimensional tongue shape using a three-index factor analysis model

Abstract: Three-dimensional tongue shape during vowel production is analyzed using the three-mode PARAFAC (parallel factors) model. Three-dimensional MRI images of five speakers (9 vowels) are analyzed. Sixty-five virtual fleshpoints (13 segments along the rostral-caudal dimension and 5 segments along the right-left direction) are chosen based on the interpolated tongue shape images. Methods used to adjust the alignment of MRI images, to set up the fleshpoints, and to measure the position of the fleshpoints are presente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are configured such that one pattern produces a continuum from /i/-like to /a/-like vocal tract shapes while another represents an /æ/-like to /u/-like continuum, suggesting that they represent a coordination of the speech articulators necessary for vowel production. The results are similar to factor analyses of tongue shape (Harshman, Ladefoged, and Goldstein, 1977; Shirai and Honda, 1977; Nix, Papcun, Hogden, and Zlokarnik, 1996; Zheng, Hasegawa-Johnson, and Pizza, 2003), shaping components used in other articulatory models (Berry, 2003; Maeda, 1990, 1991), as well as analogous research on vocal tract area functions (Mokhtari et al, 2007). Some recent work has also shown that the shape of these patterns can be derived theoretically from calculations of acoustic sensitivity functions of the nonuniform neutral area functions of speakers (Story, 2007).…”
Section: Airway Modulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They are configured such that one pattern produces a continuum from /i/-like to /a/-like vocal tract shapes while another represents an /æ/-like to /u/-like continuum, suggesting that they represent a coordination of the speech articulators necessary for vowel production. The results are similar to factor analyses of tongue shape (Harshman, Ladefoged, and Goldstein, 1977; Shirai and Honda, 1977; Nix, Papcun, Hogden, and Zlokarnik, 1996; Zheng, Hasegawa-Johnson, and Pizza, 2003), shaping components used in other articulatory models (Berry, 2003; Maeda, 1990, 1991), as well as analogous research on vocal tract area functions (Mokhtari et al, 2007). Some recent work has also shown that the shape of these patterns can be derived theoretically from calculations of acoustic sensitivity functions of the nonuniform neutral area functions of speakers (Story, 2007).…”
Section: Airway Modulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A reanalysis of these data by Nix et al ͑1996͒, however, showed that two factors could, in fact, describe the Icelandic tongue shapes too. More recently, Zheng et al ͑2003͒ have applied a factor analysis to tongue shapes determined from 3-D image sets based on MRI. While their results were not identical to previous studies, they suggest that a large percentage of the variance in tongue shape for vowels can be described with two shaping factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At nearly the same time Shirai and Honda (1977) demonstrated that the tongue configuration could be described by two empirically-determined displacement patterns. Subsequent studies of tongue shape using either factor or principal component analyses have similarly concluded that two shaping patterns can generally describe the midsagittal tongue shape during vowel production in various languages (Johnson et al 1993;Nix et al 1996;Hoole, 1999;Zheng et al 2003;Iskarous, 2005). In each study, the shaping patterns more or less conform to the view that one pattern captures the forward and upward movement of the tongue, while a second pattern describes upward and backward motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%