Analysis of the State of the Art of International Policies and Projects on CCU for Climate Change Mitigation with a Focus on the Cases in Korea

Jung, Seok; Lee, Seong Ho; Min, Jihee; Lee, Mee Hye; Ahn, Ji Whan

doi:10.3390/su13010019

Cited by 9 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a geographical level, relevant analyses provided a detailed roadmap to reduce GHG emissions and to create new climate industries through early demonstration of capture and utilization (CCU) technology. Among the counties examined, the Korean government established the 2030 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Roadmap in 2016 and included carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology in the new energy industry sector as a CCU technology (Jung et al, 2021). It was particularly denoted that the U.S., Germany, and China also expect CCUS technology to play a decisive role in reducing GHGs in the industrial sector in terms of climate and energy policy (Jung et al, 2021).…”

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the counties examined, the Korean government established the 2030 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Roadmap in 2016 and included carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology in the new energy industry sector as a CCU technology (Jung et al, 2021). It was particularly denoted that the U.S., Germany, and China also expect CCUS technology to play a decisive role in reducing GHGs in the industrial sector in terms of climate and energy policy (Jung et al, 2021). Such CCUrelated policies and technological trends in the U.S., Germany, and China included major climate and energy plans, driving roadmaps, government-led projects and institutional support systems.…”

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such CCUrelated policies and technological trends in the U.S., Germany, and China included major climate and energy plans, driving roadmaps, government-led projects and institutional support systems. It was expected these regulatory tools to contribute to responding to climate change, to promote domestic GHG reduction, to create future growth engines, being also used as basic data for the establishment of CCU-related policies (Jung et al, 2021).…”

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Energy Poverty and Low Carbon Just Energy Transition: Comparative Study in Lithuania and Greece

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

EU has set ambitious commitment to achieve low carbon energy and economy transition up to 2050. This low carbon transition means sustainable energy development path based on renewable energy sources and first of all should address the energy poverty vulnerability and justice issues. The main goal of the paper is to develop indicators framework for assessing low carbon just energy transition and to apply this framework for analysis how climate change mitigation policies in households targeting enhancement of energy renovation of residential buildings and promotion of the use of micro-generation technologies and other policies are affecting household’s energy poverty and vulnerability in selected countries: Lithuania and Greece. This framework allows to assess three main dimensions of sustainable energy development: environmental, social and economic. The paper provides policy recommendations how to deal with just low carbon energy transition which means addressing energy poverty issues during moving to 100% renewables in power generation based on performed case studies.

show abstract

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Regulatory Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Energy Poverty and Low Carbon Just Energy Transition: Comparative Study in Lithuania and Greece

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pioneered CCUS research, expanding from the traditional CCS to CCU [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, the study serves as a basic overview for establishing CCUS-related R&D policies, the roles of which will continue to increase in achieving carbon neutrality. [2,4,10,15]. Academic DBs such as the National Digital Science Library (NDSL), DBpia, and the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), and websites of Korean government ministries such as that of the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) were used to study literature on the carbon-neutral policy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Korea’s Green Technology Policy and Investment Trends for the Realization of Carbon Neutrality: Focusing on CCUS Technology

Jung

Kim²,

Kang

et al. 2022

Processes

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2008, the Republic of Korea announced the Low Carbon Green Growth vision as the national growth engine. This Green Growth vision invested in developing state-of-the-art green technologies to minimize greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions. Following a change in administration, Korean green technologies were re-categorized into six core technologies for climate change response in 2014, and ten core technologies for carbon-neutrality in 2021. The government proposed the realization of an inclusive green state in the 3rd Five-Year Green Growth Plan announced in 2019. Following the Green New Deal announced in 2020, green technology policies and investments continue, with the declaration of 2050 carbon neutrality. In the past two years, government policies from the 2050 Carbon Neutrality Strategy to the 2050 Carbon-Neutral Scenario consider Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as an important technology to reduce CO2 and meet carbon-neutral goals. This study examines major green technology policy trends, focusing on CCUS, beginning with the Green Growth era in 2008 to today. R&D investment costs related to green technology during the green growth period and CCUS-related investment costs over the past 10 years (2011–2020) are utilized in statistical analyses (correlation, trend) to investigate and analyze investment volatility in green and CCUS technologies related to climate change. Finally, the study will provide basic information for establishing CCUS-related R&D policies, which will continue to increase in achieving carbon neutrality.

show abstract

Systematic approach to a government‐led technology roadmap for future‐ready adaptive traffic signal control systems

Balaci,

Suh

2024

Systems Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The economic impact of inefficient traffic control systems is significant owing to prolonged commute durations, and increased energy consumption. Traffic signal control systems (TSCSs) significantly influence traffic flows at intersections. Therefore, adaptive TSCSs (ATSCSs) that can adjust to traffic conditions in real‐time have been proposed as more efficient alternatives. However, the expensive implementation of these systems highlights the need for judicious investments in appropriate technologies and infrastructure. Therefore, a comprehensive technology roadmap should be built that guides the future development of traffic control and the infusion of technologies to address traffic needs. Additionally, as ATSCSs are developed and managed by local governments, the perspective of a government‐led technology roadmap is required to guide the roadmap development and implementation. Although studies have explored technology roadmaps across numerous sectors, the viewpoint of roadmap development guided by government entities is frequently neglected despite the role of these entities in shaping technological policies, underwriting research and development initiatives, and driving nationwide innovation strategies. In this study, a comprehensive framework is proposed for developing technology roadmaps tailored for systems and technologies led by governmental entities. This framework has been adapted from the Advanced Technology Roadmap Architecture (ATRA) and brought original adjustments thereby addressing the research gap. The study also presents strategic recommendations for the ATSCS implementation in South Korea, integrating systems engineering principles for a holistic approach to technological advancements. The framework can be replicated to serve as a guide for governments seeking to implement effective and efficient technology roadmaps for public infrastructure systems.

show abstract

Analysis of the State of the Art of International Policies and Projects on CCU for Climate Change Mitigation with a Focus on the Cases in Korea

Cited by 9 publications

References 7 publications

Energy Poverty and Low Carbon Just Energy Transition: Comparative Study in Lithuania and Greece

Energy Poverty and Low Carbon Just Energy Transition: Comparative Study in Lithuania and Greece

Analysis of Korea’s Green Technology Policy and Investment Trends for the Realization of Carbon Neutrality: Focusing on CCUS Technology

Systematic approach to a government‐led technology roadmap for future‐ready adaptive traffic signal control systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About