2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2072617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Spatial Relationship between Cattle and Wild Ungulates across Different Land-Use Systems in a Tropical Savanna Landscape

Abstract: In many African savanna landscapes, domestic and wild herbivores cooccur across different land-use systems, but the role of land-use in shaping their spatial relationship is poorly understood. We evaluated the spatial relationship between cattle and wild herbivores categorized by body sizes and feeding habits across different land-use types, namely, private ranches (PR), transitional lands (TRL), and pastoral grazing areas (PGA), in Laikipia County, Kenya. Cattle and wild herbivores spatial distribution data w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the different kind of livestock (e.g., yak and sheep) may disturb the environment in different ways (Bakker, Ritchie, Olff, Milchunas, & Knops, ; Kinga, Mironga, & Odadi, ; Metera, Sakowski, Słoniewski, & Romanowicz, ; Rook et al, ; Tóth et al, ), and even for the same livestock type, the disturbance may be discrepant in the different season (e.g., cold season and warm season; Ash & Mcivor, ; Luo et al, ; Wu, Wang, Liu, Ding, & Liu, ) or in the different grassland type (e.g., alpine meadow and steppe; Bakker et al, ; Cingolani, Cabido, Renison, & Neffa, ). These discrepancies reminded us that the effect of grazing on CSR strategy assembly of grassland may change due to the difference in livestock type, grassland type, or season of grazing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the different kind of livestock (e.g., yak and sheep) may disturb the environment in different ways (Bakker, Ritchie, Olff, Milchunas, & Knops, ; Kinga, Mironga, & Odadi, ; Metera, Sakowski, Słoniewski, & Romanowicz, ; Rook et al, ; Tóth et al, ), and even for the same livestock type, the disturbance may be discrepant in the different season (e.g., cold season and warm season; Ash & Mcivor, ; Luo et al, ; Wu, Wang, Liu, Ding, & Liu, ) or in the different grassland type (e.g., alpine meadow and steppe; Bakker et al, ; Cingolani, Cabido, Renison, & Neffa, ). These discrepancies reminded us that the effect of grazing on CSR strategy assembly of grassland may change due to the difference in livestock type, grassland type, or season of grazing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on wildlife–livestock conflicts has focused on livestock as victims of predation from large carnivores [ 13 , 14 , 15 ] and even attacks from elephants [ 16 ]. Elsewhere, livestock gradually exclude resident large mammalian herbivores from food, water and space in rangelands [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. The extensive grazing of livestock has also been associated with damage to ground vegetation, which may lead to a decline of terrestrial fauna species adapted to dense ground cover [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%